Saturday, 10 November 2012 00:32

Book Review, by Silas Henderson

Written by Paul H. Treick

Tim R. Tebow, (with Nathan Whitaker) Through My Eyes, HarperCollins Publishers, 2011. Pp.xi + 260 $11.99

My name is Silas Henderson. I go by “Si-Guy.” I am eleven years old and am a member of Ebenezer Reformed Church, Shafter, CA. At my dad’s suggestion, I am submitting this book review about the life of Mr. Tim Tebow, who is currently the starting quarterback for the Denver Broncos, an NFL professional football team.

The book that I am reviewing is entitled, Through My Eyes, by Tim R. Tebow. The 257+ page book covers his personal life as he saw it, “through his eyes.”

My own personal overall opinion of the book is that it is an exciting, well-written inside scoop about the life and Christian faith of Mr. Tebow from his birth to his becoming a pro-football player.

First, here are some things you might want to know about this book before buying it: If you are a “Tebow” fan like me, then you will really like the book. Second, if the game of football is one of your favorite sports then you will like all the detailed stuff that he has about the game itself. Thirdly, he professes Christ and talks about his faith in God through the entire book and how it helped him achieve his goals. I am really grateful that he is honest and open about his faith in Christ. He has taken a lot of heat for his openness about his faith. Fourthly, one thing that might bother some people is the fact that he is not “Reformed” in all of his Christian beliefs, especially when it comes to working on the Lord’s Day.

I would like to finish my review with a quote by Mr. Tebow from the last chapter of the book. “As I’ve said before, I don’t know what my future holds, but I do know who holds my future. With that in mind, I’m pressing on toward the upward call of Jesus Christ, seeking to continue living in the way that always brings glory to Him. I hope it’s on the football field, at least for now. But I know that He knows my platform and holds my future in His hands, and it’s up to me to use it as best as I can wherever He has me planted. God’s Word will not return void. Football has always been my passion, and in one way or another, it will always be my passion. I simply pray that I will continue to have the humbling privilege to touch others and lift them up through His Word—all for His glory” (pp. 256–257).

Saturday, 10 November 2012 00:32

Congregational News

Written by Paul H. Treick

Eureka RCUS, Eureka, SD

Sanrow Koerner, went home to be with the Lord on Sunday, December 4th, after suffering several “ministrokes” last week. Sanrow loved the Lord and served as an elder of the Eureka Reformed Church. His funeral was held Thursday, December 8th, at the Eureka Reformed Church.

He was born March 13, 1921, to Henry and Lydia (Ladner) Koerner, in rural Eureka, SD, on the family homestead.

On May 2, 1943, Sanrow was united in marriage to Alice Schock at Salem Emmanuel Lutheran Church at Long Lake, SD.

Sanrow was a rural Eureka school teacher from 1941 to 1943; proprietor of Recreation Parlors from 1943 to 1949; owner of Eureka Distributing Co., a beverage wholesale company, from 1949 to 1967; sales representative for Investors Diversified Services and Hardy Salt Co. from 1967 to 1968; employed at Eureka Equity Exchange from 1968 to 1986. Sanrow retired in 1986 and enjoyed his hobbies of golf, bridge, yard work and reading.

Alice died August 23, 2005, and Sanrow continued to reside in his home until March 2007, when he moved to the Avera Eureka Health Care Center.

He was a member of the Eureka Reformed Church, where he served as a church Elder from 1967 to 1973. He also served as the chairman of the Eureka Reformed Church Building Committee in 1956. Sanrow was also involved in various community groups to include: the Eureka Chamber of Commerce in which he was President in 1954; a Eureka Public School Board Member in 1957; and a Eureka Community Hospital Board Member from 1977 to 1983.

Sanrow died Sunday, December 4, 2011, at the Avera Eureka Health Care Center. He was preceded in death by his parents Henry and Lydia, infant sister Angie, brother Marvin, and wife Alice.

He is survived by his son Charles and wife Bonnie Koerner, of Eureka, SD; his daughter Carol Jean Koerner and husband Jerry Boyer of Spearfish, SD; his grandchildren, Trent, Julie, and their children Rachel and Rebecca Koerner, of Dilworth, MN, Brett, Kelly, and their children Ross and Kolby Koerner of Grand Forks, ND, and Michelle Koerner and husband Luka Arsenjuk of College Park, MD. Sanrow is also survived by his Brother Andrew and Irma Koerner of Eureka, sisterinlaws Betty Koerner of Williston, ND, Vina Rall of Simi Valley, CA and Fern Schock of Billings, MT, and nieces and nephews.

Sanrow’s loved ones covet your prayers in this time of sorrow. Though he will be greatly missed, we rejoice in Christ knowing that this dear saint in Christ is with his Lord and Savior in heaven.

Saturday, 10 November 2012 00:31

Philippine Ministry Update

Written by Paul H. Treick

 

By Rev. Napolean Narag, United Covenant Reformed Church, Calauan, Laguna, Philippines

“Preserve me, O God, for in you I take refuge. I say to the Lord, ‘You are my Lord; I have no good apart from you.’ As for the saints in the land, they are the excellent ones, in whom is all my delight. The sorrows of those who run after another god shall multiply; their drink offerings of blood I will not pour out or take their names on my lips. The Lord is my chosen portion and my cup; You hold my lot. The lines have fallen for me in pleasant places; indeed, I have a beautiful inheritance. I bless the Lord who gave me counsel; in the night also my heart instructs me. I have set the Lord always before me; because He is at my right hand, I shall not be shaken. Therefore my heart is glad, and my whole being rejoices; my flesh also dwells secure. For you will not abandon my soul to Sheol, or let your holy one see corruption. You make known to me the path of life; in your presence there is fullness of joy; at your right hand are pleasures forevermore” (Ps. 16 ESV).

Personal and Family Update

Psalm 16 has been (and will always be) a great comfort for me when God seems so distant, and one is under trepidation, discouragement, and anguish because of the incidents happening in his life, which are beyond understanding and explanation. After the death of my mother, when I conducted several nightly services, sharing the Gospel with my friends and relatives back in our province, I became so sickly and so weak that I could hardly move to do church ministry, and even ordinary things, which my heart desires to do. I was so troubled because when I visited my doctor in Manila, I was told that my former illness (Polyarthritis Nodossa) was recurring. Added to the burden was the thought of the demand of finances for medications and laboratory examinations.

To God alone be the glory, for His words are a great source of comfort, assurance and bliss. By reading and meditating on Psalm 16, I rejoice to know that, notwithstanding my dismal situation, I can still experience joy and pleasure in God because He never fails to fulfill His promises. Verse 11 says, “In Your presence is fullness of joy; at Your right hand there are pleasures forever.” The scholarly German commentator, Franz Delitzsch, wrote of Psalm 16 (Commentary on the Old Testament in Ten Volumes [Eerdmans], by C. F. Keil and F. Delitzsch, p. 217), “There reigns in the whole psalm a settled calm, an inward joy, and a joyous confidence, which is certain that everything that it can desire for the present and for the future it possesses in its God.” The Lord in this psalm is telling us that when the Lord is our supreme treasure, we will be satisfied with pleasures now and forever in him.

My heart rejoices exceedingly because the Lord is indeed good to those who put their trust in Him. He not only provided for the medications needed, He brought healing to me. I am now back in the ministry and I am also involved in denomination-wide activities which my heart always desired to do. Thank you very much my dear brethren for all your prayers and help. There is indeed exceeding consolation in realizing that there are brethren like you, who not only affirm that they care, but also unconditionally help carry and lighten the burden. As David said, so I say also, “As for the saints in the land, they are the excellent ones, in whom is all my delight.” God always invites us to enjoy Him no matter what our situation might be because in Him there is fullness of joy and pleasures forever! Psalm 34:8 says, “O taste and see that the Lord is good.”

Charisse and Deane are doing well in school; Charisse is now in her third year in College while Deane is in third year in High School. Difficult as it was to keep them in school, we are so grateful to the Lord for His provisions and for sustaining both their need for tuition fees, projects, and daily expenses. It is all by God’s grace that we were able to let them go this far in their studies. Again glory and honor be to our God for His goodness and faithfulness.

Diven will be out of her job next year because their work area here in Laguna will be dissolved and will be transferred to Mindoro. We don’t know what tomorrow will be like and what it will bring us after Diven loses her job, but we have this assurance in our hearts: we know who holds our tomorrows. And we are confident that as He has been faithful to us the past years of our lives, there is no reason that He will not be faithful to us even in the coming days of our lives, because He is the God who is ever faithful to His promises. He is the origin, the sustainer and end of everything in our lives. As Romans 11:36 says; “For from Him and through Him and to Him are all things. To Him be the glory forever” (Rom. 11:36 ESV).

Church Ministry Update

The UCRCP Laguna welcomed Hernando Bonaobra (Kuya Nanding) as a new member of the church last October 2011. Kuya Nanding is a graduate of the Christian Reformed Bible College here in Calauan, and a former elder of Los Baños Christian Reformed Church. He has been in the ministry serving different churches for quite some time already. But because of his Reformed conviction, he realizes that he has to go back and be in a Reformed church. We rejoice in the Lord for adding Kuya Nanding to us. Through the outworking of God’s providence, we believe that Kuya Nanding will be a big help in the life and ministry of the Church.

Another brother whom I believe can be of big help to us is Ernesto (Ej) Alcantara. He expresses his willingness to be involved in the ministry, but needs to prepare himself through seminary training. We don’t have a good Reformed seminary here, moreover, the capacity to send him away to study. We just settled ourselves for the meantime in personal one-on-one training. I am doing this with him and Kuya Nanding every Wednesday. May the Lord provide us a way to train and prepare our men for ministries in the UCRCP through a Reformed seminary. Please pray with us about this concern.

Praise the Lord, our church (UCRCP Laguna) is finally scheduled to be organized in January. But prior to this organization, our three brethren Cezar Fagtanac, Ronald Comandante, and Ernesto Alcantara need to prepare themselves for interview and examination by Classis on the third Saturday of November to become elders. Please pray with me as I prepare them for the said interview and examination, and as the brethren from Las Piñas and Pangasinan (Pastor Edwin Puzon, Brother Alfred Santiago, Atty. Raffy Martinez and Brother Boy Cabugao) travel here to Laguna.

Join us in thanking the Lord also regarding our ministry in Santa Cruz, Laguna. It is with great joy that we want to inform you that our outreach ministry there is doing well. We are so grateful to the Lord for leading Pastor Ver Sigue, a man of God who loves the truth, taught in the Reformed Church, to join our denomination. I am now conducting indoctrination for eight people every Saturday in Santa Cruz. We hope they become official members of our church in March 2012. They expressed their commitment to become part of our church by attending our worship service last October 23, 2011. Their presence was a great joy and encouragement to the brethren in Calauan to continually hope in the Lord for the growth of His church. The Lord indeed is the One who is adding to His church those who are ordained to eternal life. We appeal to you therefore, brethren, to please pray with us. There is great need to sustain the ministry, especially in helping Pastor Ver with his needs to be able to do ministry in that place regularly.

Our outreach in Santa Rosa, Laguna, however, was discontinued due to our incapacity to support the ministry there. In fact, the Lord has opened another opportunity for us also to have an outreach in Quezon Province, a four-hour drive from San Pablo, Laguna. There is a already a place of worship, and more-or-less 70 people ready for worship. But we are still a very young and small church. Our ability to take action on all of these opportunities that the Lord opens to us is still wanting. We cannot do otherwise but to pray and hope in the Lord, that He will use other ways to reach out to those whom He ordained to eternal life in those places. Our hearts are so heavy to see, and yet be unable to respond to, the spiritual needs of the people. We can only do as much as the ability which the Lord presently gives us. The words of the Scripture are indeed true; “The harvest truly is plentiful but the laborers are few. Pray therefore the Lord of the harvest, that he will send forth laborers into his harvest” (Matt. 9:37–38). Our present situation offers lots of challenges regarding ministry opportunities and spreading the truth of the Gospel in many places. Please pray with us that the Lord indeed will send forth laborers to his harvest and use people who are willing to help and invest in this endeavor.

Not everything that takes place in our life and our church is favorable to us. There are victories and pleasant things as well as discouraging and depressing things that come our way. The Lord allows us to experience discouraging and depressing things so that we will not depend on ourselves and boast before Him. He also allows us to experience victories and pleasant things so that we might learn to be thankful to Him and acknowledge Him, that He is the source of everything. We need to be cautious in accepting people as members of our church. We learned our lesson via a hard and hurtful way.

Yes, we lost one family. But praise be to God for bringing another family, which we are now encouraging to consider church membership. He, his wife and three children, have been attending our church for about three months already. He has difficulties accepting the Regulative Principles of Worship (and some other Reformed doctrines). But as I patiently discuss and explain to him these doctrines, he now slowly is digesting it within himself. The last time we had a group study, he expressed his desire to want to learn more. He is also amazed how we give importance to every aspect of the liturgy of our worship. Please pray with us again for the brother and his family, that the Lord will enlighten their minds to come to the knowledge of the truth of the teachings of the Scripture.

Let me end this update by quoting again verse 1 of Psalm 16: “Preserve me, O God, for in you I take refuge. I say to the Lord, ‘You are my Lord; I have no good apart from you.’” We have to truly affirm that in our hearts always, we have no good apart from the Lord. With every endeavor, every success, as well as every hurting and unpleasant thing that happens to us, the Lord is always there caring for us through His love and providence. In other words, everything the Lord is doing to us, in us, and through us, He is doing for our good and for His glory alone. May we all find complete pleasure and satisfaction in our God as we continue to live our life for Him and do the ministry He entrusted to us. Soli Dei Gloria.

Saturday, 10 November 2012 00:30

Peace on Earth, Good Will to Men

Written by Robert Grossmann

When we think about Christmas as the celebration of Christ’s birth, we think of God’s promise that “there is born to you this day, in the city of David, a Savior, who is Christ the Lord.” The coming of Christ as the Son of God who “takes upon Himself the very nature of man, of the flesh and blood of the Virgin Mary” (HC Q35), is indeed the central event of the history of the world. Without the coming of Christ, all of us would be doomed to spending eternity in hell for the punishment of our sins. Indeed, Joseph is commanded to “call His name Jesus, for He shall save His people from their sins.” God’s answer to the guilt and sinfulness of the human race is not to sweep those sins under the rug, but literally to punish His own Son in our place, so that “He (God) might be just and the justifier of him who believes in Jesus” (Rom. 3:26).

When we look at the problem of sin from God’s point of view, we need to recognize that if God does not punish sinners, He becomes our partner in crime. In every state law code in the United States we have laws against participating in planning a crime, laws for example, that demand punishment not only for murderers, but also for “conspiracy to commit murder.” In the same way, we also have laws against being an “accessory after the fact,” which is to know that a crime has been committed and not bring that crime to the attention of the authorities. Thus if God knows that I have murdered you, and God of course knows everything, God becomes an accessory after the fact. He becomes my partner in crime if He fails to punish me. Now, most people, and even Christians, have never thought about or considered sin from God’s point of view, beyond knowing that He is against it, and they therefore easily miss the real nature of Christ’s work as our Savior. Thus, when you and I celebrate Christmas, we must never forget the fact that as He Himself said, “I did not come to call the righteous, but sinners to repentance” (Matt. 9:13).

Christmas then is a celebration of God’s mercy upon a world of lost and dying sinners. Every sinner chosen by God to receive this Savior will infallibly be given the gift of faith by which we receive Christ and all His benefits. Nevertheless, there is another side to the coming of Christ into the world that is expressed by the heavenly host saying, “Glory to God in the highest, and on earth, peace, good will to men.” As we seek to understand these words the problem of proper translation arises. Several modern translations follow the Roman Catholic Latin Vulgate in using words such as, “Peace on earth to men of good will,” (these include the New International Version, the New American Standard Version, and the English Standard Version).

The older King James and New King James versions follow Luther’s German translation in saying, “Peace on earth, good will to men.” In my judgment this older translation, “Peace on earth, good will to men,” expresses the Greek expression best. The wording is a bit out of the ordinary, saying literally, “and on earth peace, in men good will.” Calvin notes that this is a somewhat obscure use of “en” (“in” in English) here, but concludes, “...the simpler way is to look upon “eudokia” (“good will”) as added, to inform us of the source from which our peace is derived.” It seems to this writer that Calvin is eminently right on this point, and we will take his meaning throughout this article, for it teaches a very important truth that flows from Christ’s birth.

Not only will the Savior “save His people from their sins,” as the angel told Joseph while commanding him to name this child “Jesus,” there will be peace from God and good will from Him to all men deriving from the special grace of salvation given to believers.

This teaching that God promises peace and good will to all men as a result of Christ’s birth is the normal Reformed doctrine of “common grace.” Reformed teaching distinguishes between God’s undeserved gift of eternal salvation to His chosen people as the “doctrine of grace,” but we also express this grace by several adjectives, such as, “saving grace,” “special grace,” or “redeeming grace.” As Paul says in Romans 11:5, “At this present time there is also a remnant according to the election of grace.”

But what about the rest of the world? Do the unbelievers who are in rebellion against God deserve to even live, much less, to enjoy the wonderful creation in which God has placed them alongside of those He has chosen unto eternal life? No way, not at all. And we have to recognize that Christians don’t deserve to live in this wonderful world either. Therefore, we have to conclude that the continuation of life and blessings upon the believer and unbeliever alike is an unmerited mercy, an act of grace. Since this grace is common to believer and unbeliever alike, it is called “common grace” by Reformed theologians.

Since other theologies do not recognize the depths of man’s depravity, they seldom think to answer questions of this nature and thus do not recognize the need for a biblical common grace, and often for a truly saving grace either. Arminian and related theologies claim that “common grace,” is a grace that enables every human to be saved by appropriating Christ’s saving work to himself. This teaching follows the reasoning that Christ died for everyone and thus leaves our salvation up to our own decision, which on the basis of biblical teaching is simply impossible. Faith unto salvation is a gift of God, not a product or our own will or ability (Eph. 2:8–9).

It seems to this writer that the same reasoning, or lack of reasoning about depravity, is the reason for translating our text, “peace to men of good will,” as though some men were good, or could “see the kingdom of God” without being “born from above” (which is impossible; see John 3:3). Much more important than reasoning, however, is that the Bible actually teaches that there is common grace that includes God’s goodness to the unbelievers while in this life. When Jesus wants to teach us our responsibility to “love our enemies,” He uses God Himself as our example, saying, “But I say to you, love your enemies, bless those who curse you, and pray for those who despitefully use you and persecute you, that you may be sons of your Father in heaven, for He makes His sun to rise on the evil and on the good, and sends rain on the just and the unjust” (Matt. 5:44–45). This teaching of Jesus is clear: God is good to His enemies while they are in this life.

Now we properly conclude that God is good to His enemies for sake of the elect, just as He blessed Egypt while Israel was there. Just as God enabled Egypt to survive the seven year famine, and continue for the four hundred years that Israel sojourned there, so God preserves and blesses the world while Christians live in it. Indeed, when Peter raises the question of why the world has not ended, he answers by saying that not all the elect have been saved yet (2 Pet. 3:9).

What our text, “Peace on earth, good will to men,” adds to this picture is that this common grace that sustains the world in livable condition is the result of the coming of Christ the Savior into the world. Thus while Christ did not die for the lost in order to save them, His work has, as one of its byproducts, a world in which the rain falls on the just and the unjust, and which is therefore a wonderful place for human beings to live, be they Christians or unbelievers. Indeed, when Paul preaches the gospel in Lystra (Acts 14), He tells these pagan folks that God “did not leave Himself without witness, in that He did good, gave us rain from heaven and fruitful seasons, filling our hearts with food and gladness.” Common grace makes the unbeliever without excuse for not acknowledging the one true God.

It should be clear that as we celebrate the birth of Christ, we need to be aware that the wonderful quality of life in this sinful world is because the rain falls on the good and on the evil, and that this is because there really is peace from God and good will toward men. Certainly there are all kinds of problems, trials, and dangers for sinful human beings living in a world of sinful human beings; there is precious little peace and good will among men, and yet living in this world is a wonderful experience. Even for those who suffer various miseries, life is preferable to death. This is because God hinders sin and delays His final judgement, and indeed blesses this undeserving world until all His chosen ones are saved. The angel announced, “There is born to you in the city of David, a Savior who is Christ the Lord,” and the heavenly host sang, “and on earth peace, good will toward men.” Both are gifts from God necessary for our salvation! Without a Savior, no one would be saved. And, without peace and good will from God toward men, this world would be made sterile and chaotic by sin, not a place where life and salvation are possible.

Saturday, 10 November 2012 00:26

Christmas—A Promise and Providence

Written by George Horner

Once again, we celebrate Christmas—God sending His only begotten Son into the world to save His people from their sins. The Christmas story we read in the gospels of Matthew and Luke is a fulfillment of God’s promise of the Savior.

The history of that promise goes all the way back to the Garden of Eden. The seed of the woman promised to fallen-into-sin Adam and Eve.That history is punctuated also by God’s covenant promise to Abraham to be God to Him and His descendants after him. To fulfill that promise God Himself would come in the flesh. Christ Jesus is Immanuel, the name that means God with us.

The Jews of the book of Esther were descendants of their forefather Abraham. They were God’s covenant people. They knew of God’s promise in the Garden and to them. They knew the history of God’s faithfulness to His promises. They were, after all, the descendants of the people God had delivered out of bondage into the promised land. They knew of God’s providential care over them in the wilderness and in defeating their enemies. They knew that the focal point of God’s promise to be God to them was the mercy seat in the temple in Jerusalem on God’s holy hill of Zion.

Their Lord God was in their midst, since they were His holy people, in the holy promised land, Jerusalem, the temple, God’s holy hill, Zionthroughout their long history as God’s people. There is where God’s people lifted up their eyes since their God was in their midst. From there came their help ( Ps. 121).

So, when you read the Old Testament historical books, you’d expect to find that the Lord God’s name would be conspicuously mentioned, that you would find God’s holy law often referred to as the standard for living as God’s people. There you would find a longing for the promised land, a focus on the feast days by which to remember the Lord God’s great deeds of deliverance, like Passover.

And indeed, in those OT books of the Bible that recount the history of God’s covenant people from the time of Abraham, the Name of the Lord God is conspicuously prominent. From Exodus through to Joshua, Judges and then Samuel and Kings and Chronicles and through prophets, major and minor, the name of the Lord God appears many thousands of times. There are prominent references to the promised land, the temple, and to Zion to make it clear that it is the focal point of Old Testament history.

And the expected longing for the promised land? Consider Psalm 137, a lament arising from God’s people as they were away from the promised land in captivity: “By the rivers of Babylon, there we sat down, yea, we wept when we remembered Zion, we hung our harps in the willows. . . How shall we sing the Lord’s song in a foreign land. If I forget you, O Jerusalem, let my right hand forget its skill, If I do not remember you, let my tongue cling to my mouth if I do not exalt Jerusalem above my chief joy.”

Longing for the promised land—it’s there in the historical account of the Old Testament. And then as well, within those historical and prophetic books there are hundreds of prophecies of the coming of Christ as was the veiled promise in the Garden, including several that place His first coming to where?.... in the promised land. Leviticus 24:17 says: “I see Him, but not now; I behold Him, but not near; a star shall come out of Jacob; a scepter shall arise out of Israel.”

The focus was on the Lord God and on the promised land and looking ahead to the coming of Immanuel there where God had established His temple presence among His people. That focus is so evident by clear reference and types and shadows in the books of the Old Testament.

But then, there’s the Old Testament historical book of Esther. It recounts the history of God’s people between the promise of the seed of the woman and the coming of Immanuel. This book of Esther is indeed part of the God-breathed Old Testament scriptures, and yet, here’s the shocker, the “what. . . how could this be?” In this book, the Lord God is not mentioned even once. The Jerusalem temple, the promised land, Zion, the law, the Passover—none are mentioned at all in that book.

What’s going on here? In this account of God’s people, neither God nor the promised land are spoken of. Was it because God and the promised land are not in the thoughts of His people?

There is something very wrong with the people of God when they have apparently forgotten their God, lost their focus on the promised land, and give no evidence of being God’s own holy people. What does God intend to teach us in this book where He and the promised land are quite apparently missing from its pages?

What we are to see, via this book of Esther, is that God continues faithfully to care for His people for the sake of His promise, even as they show no devotion to or dependence on Him.

Even before God’s people Israel crossed the Jordan River to possess the promised land, the Lord God, as recorded in Deuteronomy 28, warns them that if they turn away from Him, that will yield the covenant curses of captivity in a foreign nation.

And indeed, generations after Solomon builds the Jerusalem temple, God’s people, because they have turned away from the Lord, are taken captive first by the Assyrian empire, 722 BC and later, in 586 BC, by the notorious Babylonian King Nebuchadnezzar. The Babylonian empire was then conquered by the Persians, and the history of the book of Esther takes place during the reign of the Persian king Ahasuerus, during the late 400s BC.

So the events in the Book of Esther take place some 200 years following God’s people being taken away from the promised land by Nebuchadnezzar. During that time, many generations of Jews grew up in Persia never having lived in the promised land, never having seen the Jerusalem temple. But yet these Jews living now in Persia are of God’s people to whom God had promised this in Deuteronomy 30: “So it shall be when all of these things have come upon you, the blessing and the curse which I have set before you, and you call them to mind in all nations where the Lord your God has banished you, and you return to the Lord your God and obey Him with all your heart and soul according to all that I command you today, you and your sons, then the Lord your God will restore you from captivity, and have compassion on you, and will gather you again from all the peoples where the Lord your God has scattered you. If your outcasts are at the ends of the earth, from there the Lord your God will gather you, and from there He will bring you back. And the Lord your God will bring you into the land which your fathers possessed, and you shall possess it; and He will prosper you and multiply you more than your fathers.”

It is estimated that about 50,000 Jews who did return from captivity under Nehemiah to rebuild the walls of Jerusalem were but a fraction of those that remained behind in Persia. Think about thatGod’s own people, to whom God had promised their return to the promised land, chose to remain in Persia rather than returning there. There was no longing for it, no lifting up their eyes to Zion, and no God and His promises in the forefront of their minds. They had accommodated themselves and conformed themselves to living in the midst of a culture whose standard for life was not the law of God—seeking not to please and obey God.

They were still known as those foreigners, the Jews, but based on their portrayal in the book of Esther, these are Jews only by nationality. They still have a nationalistic bond with one another and want to survive as a Jewish people, but their lives show neither dependence upon nor devotion to their Lord God.

Hopefully you and I are not Christians in name only, but it’s evident from our nonconformity to the ungodly culture in which we live, that our Christianity is witnessed by our dependence upon and devotion to our Lord.

Even the central Jewish characters of this book, Mordecai and Esther, are apparently non-practicing Jews. They do not pray to their God, they do not seek God’s wisdom when dealing with the foreign king. The book of Esther serves to admonish us who read it today how easily God’s people can forget God and get caught up in their ungodly culture.This book also assures us that even when God is far from the minds and hearts and mouths of even His own people, yet God, in faithfulness to His covenant, is still providentially ruling behind the scenes to fulfill His promises.

God’s activity is often behind the scenes. Although God is not at all made evident in the words of the book, yet His invisible, almighty providential power to fulfill His covenant promise is the deafening silence for us who know God from the rest of the Scriptures.

God’s faithfulness to His unfaithful people in the time of King Ahasurerus assured the birth of Immanuel from the line of these unfaithful Jews. There would be no Christmas celebration except for God’s providential rule in the events described in Esther.

And God’s faithful providential rule in all the events in our day and the rest of history assures us, His church, of Christ’s return and our eternal triumph.

In this text we will see the stage being set for events by which God’s Persian-dwelling people are preserved from destruction and therefore God’s promise of the seed of woman from them does not become null and void.

It’s been a long but necessary introduction to finally get to our text, Esther 1 to 2:4.

King Ahasuerus ruled over a huge empire. There is no earthly ruler today whose dominion extends as far and wide as the Medo-Persian territories under his rule. If you look at a map of the world, King Ahasuerus ruled over an area that extended from present-day India on the east through Iran and Iraq and up to Turkey and Greece in the west, and southward through Israel and Egypt into Ethiopia. It was a huge empire consisting of over 127 different provinces, with their own princes or governors.

It was an empire rich in material goods, the wealth of the empire being lavishly displayed in the palace of the king in the city of Susa. It was in this city located near the western end of the Persian Gulf, about 200 miles east of the city of Babylon, within the walled palace, called Shushan, that King Ahasuerus hosted this splendid feast for all the officials of the empire, a grand party that lasted for 180 days, where royal wine served in golden cups was available in abundance, and where the guests sat on couches of silver and gold on floors made of colored tiles and white and black marble.

If King Ahasuerus were to give a press conference in the east room of the citadel, he might well say: “I’m the leader of the world’s number one superpower. My rule has gained us this great wealth and glory and power.” But we get only to the twelfth verse of the book of Esther to find out that the king’s rule is not sovereign.

The king, the undisputed ruler over this huge dominating empire, rules over vast territories and peoples, yet this king’s rule over his own wife, is not only challenged, it’s downright frustrated. His queen, Vashti, does not comply with His command to come and let Him show off her beauty. This command is not only the command of the husband, but it’s the command of the King of the Persian empire.

It’s a command that is issued while the king’s heart is merry with wine. Remember what’s been going on. He had feasted with the officials of the empire for 180 days, and now it was the seventh day of the second feast that he gave for the common people.

God is telling us that this Persian culture is into feasting, lavish displays of wealth, self-indulgence, lusts of the flesh, and worldly treasures. Compare this to Daniel, when he was captive in Babylon, who when offered the king’s delicacies and wine, refused to partake as an open witness that he belonged to and depended on the Lord God of Israel.

Here we find the head of this idolatrous, vain, pleasure-seeking culture, King Ahasuerus, while quite merry with wine, desiring to show off his queen’s beauty. But his queen refused to come at the king’s command.

Commentators read a lot into this refusal, speculating why she did not come, but the text does not give us her reason. All we know is she refused to come.

The king was furious. His anger burned within him. He was the most powerful king on earth at this time and his own wife will not submit to his demands! The queen’s refusal sets in motion the sequence of events that leads to Esther, the Jewess, becoming the new queen. This is a circumstance vital to the survival of God’s people to the birth of Immanuel. God is working behind the scenes to frustrate the king in order to serve God’s providential rule for the sake of fulfilling His promise.

Esther is not like Daniel, as we’ll see. She conceals her identity as Jew and participates in the beauty queen contest.

Look at how God, working invisibly, but sovereignly behind the scenes, works King Ahasuerus’ frustration with His queen. The king meets with his cabinet (his counselors), and they recommend to him that a law be passed and written in the records, that Queen Vashti would be deposed and her position given to another who is better than her. And furthermore, the decree would command all women throughout the provinces to give honor to their husbands and comply with all their demands.

Now these counselors to the king (wise men who knew the ways of their culture and made this recommendation), were not dealing with this situation biblically. This is not surprising since they did not have a biblical worldview—neither being of God’s people nor believing in His Word.

Their society, not grounded in God’s Word, saw women as being there to please men, (kind of like the Rolling Stones’ song “Under My Thumb”) and this decree would enforce that status quo. This proposed decree pleased the king and the decree was sent out to all the provinces.

That decree which deposed Queen Vashti, officially kept her from the King’s presence in the court and set every husband up as the undisputed master of his house. This was not only made effective, but it became irrevocable.

Any executive order issued by the king which was recorded as a law of the Persian and Mede empire, could not be altered. That meant that even if King Ahasuerus were to change his mind about Queen Vashti and desire to have her come back as his Queen, he could not because the law of the Medes and the Persian was absolute even over the king’s affairs.

Ahasuerus then went and fought the Greeks and came back defeated. His anger against Vashti had subsided, and he most likely thought about her and the emptiness of the queen’s royal chair. Several years have passed, because the matter with queen Vashti took place in the third year of his reign, and Esther is not brought before the king until the seventh year of his reign (2:16). But because of the irrevocable decree issued by the king, if he is to have a queen, it cannot be Vashti. A new queen must be found.

We note that at this time the Persian empire also controlled Judah where Nehemiah had rebuilt the wall of Jerusalem. All the Jews, the covenant people of God, lived somewhere within the Persian empire, both those that had returned to the promised land under Ezra and Nehemiah, and those who chose to stay behind in Persia proper.

God’s covenant promise, the seed of the woman, seems inconsequential. After all, the controlling Persians now determined the destiny of God’s covenant people. But it is through the irrevocable law that deposes Vashti that Esther, the Jewess, became the queen through whom God preserved His people from whom He will bring forth Immanuel.

The book of Esther is an affirmation that history does not just happen. The laws passed by unrighteous men which may promote injustice and oppression nevertheless serve God’s providential care over His people for the sake of fulfilling His promise.

You and I live in the time of many sinful circumstances—men abusing power, acting with superiority toward women. Injustice and unrighteousness often seem to prevail. The way God’s people live is often, to our shame, not really distinct from the worldly culture. The question might run through our minds as we look around, what church will Christ find when He returns?

But, even as circumstances seem at times to point to a negative answer, yet the God who promised the seed of the woman and fulfilled it in spite of the Persian circumstances, promised a triumphant church at Christ’s return. God’s faithful providential rule behind the scenes assures us He will fulfill His promise no matter how unlikely that might appear to us.

God’s Word assures us that the seed of the woman, Jesus Christ, whose birth we celebrate at Christmas, will rule in heaven, at the right hand of God until every enemy has been made His footstool (Matt. 22:44, 1 Cor 15:25) until the ends of the earth are His possession, which He is building, and preserving in preparation for His return. No matter what the circumstance of God’s people is, it is not determinative of its future. God’s faithful providential rule determines our future—a glorious church dwelling before His throne in the heavenly Jerusalem.

Do not allow the sinful actions of authorities today to cause you fear and anxiety. Seek to have righteous laws passed, yes, but don’t allow the passage of bad laws to make you despondent. Trust in the providential rule of God. The seed of the woman—“God with us” celebrated at Christmas—became the reality upon which all history focused.

The focus of history now, by God’s purpose and providence, is the church triumphant at Christ’s second coming. That too, beloved will be a reality for us whose trust is in the crucified, risen, ascended, and returning Christ Jesus our Savior and Lord.

Let our lives as God’s people reflect our longing for our assured heavenly home.

Saturday, 10 November 2012 00:26

Ho, Ho, Ho

Written by Paul H. Treick

 

“Ho, Ho, Ho” are words that are usually associated with the laughter of the world’s jolly red Christmas icon. These words really have a much more important and joyous meaning for us as Christians. “Ho” is a Greek word (translated “the”) found three times in John 1:1, “In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.” There is no question that the “Word” (Logos) spoken of here three times is a reference to Jesus Christ, the Son of God and the second person of the Trinity who came in the flesh of man (cf. also 1 Jn. 1:1–2).

The incarnation of Christ which we celebrate at Christmas is more than just that Jesus came from heaven to earth as a man. That in itself is a miracle. In the very first verse of John’s Gospel he puts his finger on the most significant thing that we can know about the person of Christ—He was God! It was the Son of God who “became flesh and dwelt among us” (v. 14).

Just one more Greek reference: the Word “was” also appears here three times. “Was” is not used here in the past tense (i.e., that He previously had been . . .) The sense is that the Word “had been and continues to be” God. He did not lay aside his divinity at birth, but He laid aside the glory (Phil. 2:8). In one person—one Word—are the full, true natures of God and man. God, the sovereign and eternal Creator, walked on this earth that He had created by the power of His Word. That Word still abides and has infinite power.

What we know, sing about, and celebrate at Christmas is more than mere minds can fully comprehend. For example, we cannot explain how Jesus could physically be conceived in the virgin Mary by the Holy Spirit. How could the eternal Creator (v. 3) take on the nature of the creature and yet remain fully divine? How could the sinless Son of God “dwell among us” who are miserable sinners? These are mysteries that can only be known by believing the record of Scripture.

While we cannot comprehend the immensity of what happened at the birth of Christ, we do know and believe it. The very foundation of our faith rests on the fact that Jesus was God from all eternity. It was the coming of the Mediator—fully God and fully man—who is able to fulfill the promise of the Covenant. He must be man to bear our sin as a substitute, and also true God to be victorious over death. This is why John uses “Word” to describe Jesus. “Word” comes from the word “logos” which means to “speak intelligently.” Jesus came to fully proclaim to us the secret counsel and will of God concerning our redemption. The incarnation reveals to us the love, power, and purpose of God.

Many more things could be said about the text of John 1, but perhaps the most incomprehensible thing about the birth of Christ is the love of God that is displayed here. I believe John was overwhelmed by this very concept of God’s love. He speaks of it so often. “For God so loved the world, that He gave His only begotten Son . . .” (Jn. 2:16) Again in 1 John 4:9–10, “In this the love of God was manifested toward us, that God has sent His only begotten Son into the world, that we might live through Him. In this is love, not that we loved God, but that He loved us and sent His Son to be the propitiation for our sins.”

“The Word” came and tabernacled among us for one purpose—to bear our sins and lay His life down for those sins, that we might have complete salvation, righteousness, and life.

Christmas is often contemplated as a distant past event that took place over 2000 years ago—something pageants are made of. “The Word” continues to speak to us through the preaching of the Gospel. “The Word” also gives all believers “the right to become the sons of God ... not of blood, nor of the will of the flesh, nor of the will of man, but of God” (Jn. 1:12–13). Because of the Word, we are the sons of God and heirs of heaven. Contemplate that! And “the Word,” now exalted in the flesh at the right hand of God, is also in us by the sending of His Holy Spirit who dwells in us.

While the coming of “the Word” into the world was a long time ago, He remains with us every day to fill our lives with joy and comfort. And remember, “the Word” is coming again. John again refers to Jesus coming in great victory over every enemy, “He was clothed with a robe dipped in blood, and His name is called The Word of God” (Rev. 19:13).

The world may say their “Ho, Ho, Ho’s,” but believers who are in Christ have a different reason for joy and peace—one which does not change with the season, but endures forever. It is the “Ho Logos”—The Word made flesh—that has come to us and for us. May that joyous blessing be yours as you celebrate the incarnation.

Saturday, 10 November 2012 00:06

Congregational News

Written by Paul H. Treick

First RCUS, Yuba City, CA

Hannah Marie Milam, covenant daughter of Michael and Sharon Milam, was baptized into the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Spirit on September 25, 2011. Join us is praising God for His loving-kindness and faithfulness, keeping the promise made to Abraham from generation to generation.

Grace Reformed, Willows, CA

On September 25, Grace Reformed Church in Willows, CA celebrated its 25th anniversary with much rejoicing. A special dinner was held followed by shared memories and exhortation from three previous pastors: Rev. Bowen, Rev. Mayville, and Rev. Sawtelle. God has shown great faithfulness and blessing upon this congregation over the years. The large downtown building that we meet in has been almost completely renovated and provides lots of space for worship, classes, fellowship, and outreach. We look forward to God’s provision for our future, new opportunities for evangelism and outreach, and for the upbuilding and maturing of the saints.

Saturday, 10 November 2012 00:06

Catechism of the Church of Geneva

Written by Eric Kayayan

In 1536 Calvin published a little “Confession of Faith.” It is probably to this work that Beza refers as “a short formula of Christian doctrine”; to which, he adds, Calvin “appended a Catechism, not the one we now have, in the form of question and answer, but another much shorter, containing only the leading heads of religion.” This other “Catechism” Calvin published in French in 1541, and then with slight differences in Latin in 1545, hoping that in more international form it might also serve the cause of unity between the Churches. It is a translation of the Latin Catechism that is given here. (from the website, ondoctrine.com)

The following questions and answers are taken from the first questions and answers of the 1545 Catechism Calvin used in Geneva. You will see that Calvin’s Geneva Catechism is simple, brief, and more conversational between the Master and the Scholar than we usually see in a catechism.

Master: What is the chief end of human life?

Scholar: To know God by whom men were created.

Master: What reason have you for saying so?

Scholar: Because he created us and placed us in this world to be glorified in us. And it is indeed right that our life, of which himself is the beginning, should be devoted to his glory.

Master: What is the highest good of man?

Scholar: The very same thing.

Master: Why do you hold that to be the highest good?

Scholar: Because without it our condition is worse than that of the brutes.

Master: Hence, then, we clearly see that nothing worse can happen to a man than not to live to God.

Scholar: It is so.

Master: What is the true and right knowledge of God?

Scholar: When he is so known that due honor is paid to him.

Master: What is the method of honoring him duly?

Scholar: To place our whole confidence in him; to study to serve him during our whole life by obeying his will; to call upon him in all our necessities, seeking salvation and every good thing that can be desired in him; lastly, to acknowledge him both with heart and lips, as the sole Author of all blessings.

Master: To consider these points in their order, and explain them more fully—what is the first head in this division of yours?

Scholar: To place our whole confidence in God.

Master: How shall we do so?

Scholar: When we know him to be Almighty and perfectly good.

Master: Is this enough?

Scholar: Far from it.

Master: Wherefore?

Scholar: Because we are unworthy that he should exert his power in helping us, and show how good he is by saving us.

Master: What more then is needful?

Scholar: That each of us should set it down in his mind that God loves him, and is willing to be a Father, and the author of salvation to him.

Master: But whence will this appear?

Scholar: From his Word, in which he explains his mercy to us in Christ, and testifies of his love towards us.

Master: Then the foundation and beginning of confidence in God is to know him in Christ?

Scholar: Entirely so.

Master: I should now wish you to tell me in a few words, what the sum of this knowledge is?

Scholar: It is contained in the Confession of Faith, or rather Formula of Confession, which all Christians have in common. It is commonly called the Apostles’ Creed, because from the beginning of the Church it was ever received among all the pious, and because it either fell from the lips of the Apostles, or was faithfully gathered out of their writings.

Calvin Between Facilis Brevitas, Confessio, and Institutio:
Instruction of Faith in Geneva

Rev. Eric Kayayan

This article focuses on catechetical instruction in Geneva under Calvin, taking the 1537 Instruction and the 1545 Catechism as objects of study. The relationship between three key notions—Calvin’s own ideal of striving for brevity and simplicity on the one hand, the notions of Confessio and Institutio on the other hand—serves as catalyst to approach the nature of this catechetical instruction. After an historical overview of the circumstances amidst which the above mentioned writings were produced, a comparative study of their internal organization leads to the assessment of Calvin’s method of theological exposition when dealing with the Law and the Apostle’s Creed.

1. Striving For Simplicity

About a month before his death, on 28 April 1564, John Calvin met with the pastors of the Church of Geneva to speak to them for the last time. His first words, written down at this occasion by pastor Jean Pinaut, were:

As for my teaching, I did it faithfully, and God gave me the gracious gift of writing, which I did as faithfully as I could. I did not corrupt or distort willfully a single portion of Scripture; and whereas I could have brought forward many subtleties, I suppressed this inclination and always strove for simplicity.

After recounting the many hardships he had endured in Geneva and also acknowledging that everything he had achieved was worth nothing, even that he was a miserable creature, Calvin paradoxically insisted on his faithfulness to Scripture as an expositor:

At the very end of his life, Calvin had not changed his views on the ideal method of exposition of Scripture, striving for simplicity, as delineated in the very first of his Bible commentaries, which was on Paul’s epistle to the Romans, written in 1539 and dedicated to his friend Simon Grynaeus. In the beginning of the preface (dated 18 October 1539), he writes the following:

I remember that when three years ago we had a friendly conversation as to the best mode of expounding Scripture, the way to achieve it which you most approved was also the one I liked above all others: for we were both in agreement that the main quality of an expositor consists in simple brevity, without obscurities.

Twenty five years later, speaking of the simplicity of his style in his works (whether exegetical or not), Calvin indirectly commends this facilis brevitas which he had intended to apply throughout his life. It was, however, also for other reasons that he had to use brevity upon his return to Geneva, as he recounts in his farewell speech to the ministers:

When I came back from Strasburg, I hastily drew the catechism, for I never wanted to accept the ministry lest they solemnly grant me these two points, namely upholding the catechism and the Church discipline; and while I was writing it, people came to fetch the small pieces of paper, hardly bigger than a hand, and they carried them to the printer.

Still, this self attributed quality should not be seen as being only applicable to his exegetical works (the commentaries), to the exclusion of his catechetical writings. In the preface addressed to Grynaeus Calvin takes Melanchthon, Bullinger, and Bucer as models for various qualities in their exposition of the epistle to the Romans. The lengthy Bucer, although praised for the remarkable fecundity of his mind, is obviously not catering for all publics. If—this time on the catechetical level—one would for instance take Pierre Viret’s Instruction Chrestienne en la Doctrine de la Loy et de l’Evangile published in three volumes in 1564, he would easily understand that Calvin’s ideal of brevity has to be assessed against the background of other catechetical works published during his lifetime by fellow reformers.

2. Attempting to Discipline the Church via Confessio

From the beginning of his first stay in Geneva, September 1536, it had been Calvin’s ideal (and also the ideal of his fellow preacher and reformer Guillaume Farel) not only to draw a confession of faith and have it adopted by the City Council, but to have each and every inhabitant of the city accept it in public, starting with the magistrates. Access to the Holy Supper would be reserved for those who had performed the required act.

The city council had agreed in principle and, indeed, started requesting from everyone this public confession. It had been published and widely distributed in the city; city officers were sent to every district, and every house, to proceed with the plan. After all, it was on a memorable day in May 1536—thus a few months before Calvin’s arrival in that city—that the General Council of Geneva, consisting of all its citizens, had unanimously decided to live according to the principles of the Gospel, and to reform the life of the city under the sway of God’s Word.

The campaign launched by the Council did not yield the desired results, however, as many inhabitants of Geneva resisted this attempt to force them into a personal and public statement of faith. A second attempt, this time to gather inhabitants of the city according to their respective districts (dizaines, as they were called) and bring them to Saint-Pierre cathedral for a collective confession, proved to be no more successful. At the same time, Calvin wrote a small Christian Instruction in French. It was based on the first version of his Institutes of the Christian Religion, which had been published a few months earlier in Basel.

As opposition grew against the Reformers, tensions with the civil authorities of Geneva also arose. Early in 1538 they tried to force the ministers to accept every one at the Table of the Lord, regardless of whether the public confession of faith had been made or not. In February, four new Syndics—that is, the highest executives of Geneva’s government—were elected, who were opposed to Calvin and Farel. Meanwhile, another matter of contention had arisen, namely the insistence of the city of Bern’s authorities on imposing their liturgical practices on the cities of Geneva and Lausanne, especially with regard to the celebration of the Holy Supper.

For political reasons, the magistrates of Geneva wished to comply with the Bernese requirements. When the ministers refused to administer communion to those who had not expressed their faith publicly, and also vehemently objected to the imposition by civil authorities of given liturgical uses, they were forbidden to preach. Since they did not submit to this injunction, they were given notice on 23 April 1538 to leave the city within three days.

As Calvin recalled at the eve of his departing from earth, his return to Geneva in 1541—earnestly requested by this city’s new authorities—was linked to the acceptance of a confession of faith, which alone could guarantee access to the table of the Lord. Church discipline and confession of faith were to go hand in hand, while catechetical instruction was to lead to a personal confession of faith by the children. This, for Calvin, was not negotiable if true Church reformation was to take place. His words to the pastors on his deathbed made it plain: preaching alone did not constitute any solid reformation. As such it did not dispel the chaos and confusion prevailing in Geneva. The last point, concerning catechetical instruction, had been explicitly stated in the Articles prepared by the Reformers and presented to the Council of Geneva by Calvin himself four years earlier, halfway through January 1537:

Thirdly, in order to keep the purity of doctrine among the people, it is most necessary that children should be so instructed from their youngest age, that they may give an account of their faith and that in such a way the evangelical teaching would not diminish; on the contrary it should be carefully remembered and transmitted from father to son.

3. Institutio versus Anabaptism

We certainly find in the Articles of 1537 a strong antidote against any possible Anabaptist drift in the Church, which would make mystical, subjective and individualistic movements the actual object of faith, thus undermining any strong and articulate communal expression of it. From the beginning—that is, after his subita conversio ad docilitatem, somewhere around 1533—Calvin had been extremely wary of Anabaptism in all its forms, as the first of his theological treatises—the Psychopannychia—testifies. A sentence from the epistle to King Francis I, preceding the text of his first Institutes, speaks volumes in this respect. Calvin justifies his own enterprise by stressing the fact that before him the matter of Evangelical faith had been treated by its proponents in a rather poor and disorderly way:

“For this reason, most invincible King, I not unjustly ask you to undertake a full inquiry into this case, which until now has been handled—we may even say, tossed about—with no order of law and with violent heat rather than judicial gravity.

For a man like Calvin, strongly educated in the classical rhetorical tradition of Cicero and Quintilian, and also trained to apply methods of critical philology to juridical texts, a confessio had to be articulate, synthetic, and apt to be taught and transmitted. So too with the catechism. It is nevertheless significant that the title Institutio, which embodies some of these characteristics, is also applied to the Latin translation of the Christian Instruction, published a year later in Basel, thus in 1538.

Conversely, Calvin refers to his Institutes as a “catechismus” in various Latin letters to his friends. In the introduction to his 2008 edition of Calvin’s Institutes of 1541, O. Millet points out that from the Institutes to these two catechetical works, there is an adaptation to different functions, but in the same spirit and so to speak within the same genre. Millet also reminds us that the word Institutio had at least one precedent in patristic literature: Lactantius’ Divine Institutes during the early fourth century, a work of apologetics against pagan religion and philosophy. Erasmus had mentioned it in 1519 under the title De institutione religionis christianae which might have suggested to Calvin the title of his own project. Along with the character of a didactic summa, meaning a comprehensive survey, this Institutio had sought to establish anew the foundation of Christian doctrine; not so much as a systematic set of Loci (like Melanchthon’s Loci Communes, however much Calvin benefitted from this work for his own project and reflection) than as a Christian philosophy of faith and life, and an introductory key to Scripture intended for all: first the learned ones (those who read, wrote and spoke Latin) and then the not so learned ones (for whom was intended the 1541 French edition of the Institutes, the famous French literary masterpiece).

However, this comprehensive character of Institutio does not conflict with that of facilis brevitas (at least at this stage of Calvin’s theological reflection and expression) and the Christian Instruction of 1537 bears ample testimony to this. Comprehensiveness would grow through the subsequent versions of his Institutes, until the final French edition of 1560. Actually, the shorter confession of faith as Calvin and Farel presented it to the Council of Geneva, was considered to be a part of the Instruction, or catechism. The exact title of the confession was Confession of faith which all citizens and inhabitants of Geneva as well as subjects of the country must swear to keep and uphold; extracted from the instruction used in the Church of the aforesaid city.

One could perhaps say that the Instruction displays more the character of an Institutio, while the appended confession (even if stemming from Farel’s pen) reflects the above mentioned facilis brevitas; in the eyes of the reformers, it should have made it easy for Geneva’s population to adhere to this creedal statement. However, as we have seen, things turned out quite differently, culminating in Farel and Calvin being expelled from Geneva in April 1538.

Saturday, 10 November 2012 00:03

“Wretched, Miserable, Poor, Blind, and Naked”

Written by Sam Powell

Revelation 3:14-22

Rev. Sam Powell

We have a rich heritage. On October 31, 1517, Martin Luther challenged the Roman Catholic Church on the doctrine of the forgiveness of sins. This courageous act sparked the Protestant Reformation. Soon, John Calvin followed by publishing his great work, The Institutes of the Christian Religion. The Reformed churches were formed and creeds, catechisms, and confessions were written.

Today we have the Belgic Confession, the Canons of Dordt, and the little book that has such a cherished place in our hearts: the Heidelberg Catechism.

A rich heritage is a tremendous blessing. But a rich heritage does not leave us immune to the attacks of Satan. It does not leave us immune from the lusts of the flesh, the lust of the eyes, and the pride of life. There is a great danger that is lurking for churches with a rich heritage.

To warn each of us away from this danger, Jesus speaks to the church of the Laodiceans. They also had a rich heritage. They were founded by the apostles. It is likely that Paul himself preached there. They had embraced God’s word and embraced Christ. They were part of a rich circle of churches that were the bulwark of Christianity in the area now known as Turkey.

They were also very wealthy in material things. God had greatly prospered the city, including the church within the city. Laodicea was a tremendously influential and wealthy Roman city.

But now something is very wrong. Jesus himself addresses them. There is something so wrong here that Jesus says that he is about to vomit them up.

He uses a metaphor to explain what their problem is. He calls them “lukewarm.” Perhaps He is referring to the mineral waters that were piped in from nearby hot springs. Perhaps he is speaking of the drinking water piped in from the nearby fresh water springs. By the time Laodicea got these waters, they were lukewarm and disgusting.

Hot water is good. Cold water is good. Tepid water is disgusting, especially tepid mineral waters. It is good for nothing but to be spat up. It makes the stomach sick.

It is tempting to simply exegete the word “lukewarm” and to ignore the rest of the text. Many sermons on this text do just that. A sermon on this text generally involves telling the congregation that they need to be hot for Jesus. Either be passionate about God or an outright unbeliever, but tepid Christianity is sickening.

They are right to a certain extent. But the text itself does not define what “hot” is, or what “cold” is. “Hot” and “cold” are simply used to contrast with “lukewarm.” Lukewarm water is not therapeutically hot, nor is it refreshingly cool. It is simply sickening. Since the text is silent on the meaning of cold and hot, it would do no good to speculate. It is not actually necessary to know what hot and cold are in order to understand the message of the Lord, for the text does tell us clearly what is meant by “lukewarm.”

Jesus says, that the reason Laodicea is “lukewarm” is because they say, “I am rich, have become wealthy, and have need of nothing.”

The problem is this. The Laodiceans have lied to themselves. They said that they were rich and didn’t need anything, when the reality was far different. They weren’t rich. They were “wretched, miserable, poor, blind and naked.”

Jesus is probably referring to a recent event as an illustration of the problem. In AD 60, Laodicea had suffered a tremendous earthquake. The Empire had offered assistance, but the town refused, saying, “We have need of nothing. We are rich.”

This wasn’t necessarily a bad thing. We should try not to be a burden to others. It is a good thing to labor so that we have enough to give to those who have need (Eph. 4:28).

But here was the problem: this attitude crept into the church. They began to think of themselves as rich, in need of nothing. They were all “good Christians.” The preaching of the gospel that the preacher does is good—but it is good for those “others.” “We, of course, are rich. The sinners need to hear it. A sinner is a poor unfortunate that really needs Christ—not like us, of course. We are rich.”

A rich heritage is a blessing, but too often it turns into pride. We begin to think that we are somehow a little holier, a little wiser, and a little better that those “others” out there. Soon we begin to sound like the Pharisee in the front of the church, looking boldly into heaven and saying, “I thank God I am not like other men.”

Soon, like the Laodiceans, we begin to believe what every child of Adam believes deep in his heart: I am rich, and have need of nothing. “I’ve accepted Jesus into my heart. I learned the catechism when I was a kid. I was baptized. I am in church every Sunday. I really don’t need anything. I am rich.”

But this is a lie. And Jesus is about to vomit them out of his mouth.

For the reality is that the Laodiceans were not rich. They were wretched, miserable, poor, blind, and naked—just as all of us are.

Learning the catechism is a good thing. Learning theology from the wise pastors who have gone before is a good thing. Being reformed is a good thing. But these are only good things if they constantly remind us that we are NOT rich, but in continual, desperate need of a savior. There has never been a moment—even after we became Christians—that we have not deserved God’s eternal wrath against sin. And our misery is such that we are blinded to our own sins, even now!

This is why God put us all in churches—because we need to be constantly reminded that we are not really the cat’s meow. We are not “all that.” We are not the pinnacles of virtue and wisdom that we like to think we are. God is not “lucky” that we came to church today and put our tithes in the offering plate. We are really wretched, miserable, poor, blind, and naked.

This is why we learned the catechism when we were young. This is why the catechism has been so beloved for so long. It continually reminds us how great our sin and misery is, and how great our saviour is. The more we know, the more we offer our lives as living sacrifices of thanksgiving to God.

But at no time in our lives, from the cradle to the grave, can we ever say, “We are rich, and have need of nothing.” We know this in our own consciences. Our consciences still daily accuse us that we have “grievously sinned against all the commandments of God and have never kept any of them, and are still prone always to all evil.”

We confess this with our mouths. But do we confess this in our innermost being? Whether we are new Christians or have been Christians our whole lives, do we still say, “Lord, have mercy on me, a sinner”? Or is our attitude, “I am rich, and have need of nothing.”

We can argue with Solomon’s wisdom on the total depravity of man, and astutely apply the doctrine to politicians, celebrities, musicians, pastors, and everyone in the pew next to us—but refuse to apply it to ourselves. Too often we act as if everyone else is wretched, miserable, poor, blind, and naked and we ourselves are rich, having need of nothing.

This is why God so strictly enjoined the Ten Commandments upon us. Not so that we can pat ourselves on the back for our good efforts, but so we may always learn more and more of our sinful nature and so the more earnestly seek forgiveness of sins and righteousness of Christ.

Which is exactly what Jesus tells the Laodiceans to do (v 18): “Buy from Me gold refined in the fire, that you may be rich; and white garments that you may be clothed¼and anoint your eyes with eye salve that you may see.”

As long as we stubbornly refuse to confess our poverty, we will never know the riches that are found only in Christ. As long as we continue to take pride in the fig leaves that we have sewn together in the vain attempt to cover our shame, we will never know the white garments that come only from Christ. As long as we clamp our eyes shut while shouting “We see!” we remain blind and have no part in the tremendous freedom that comes from open eyes.

And this is not a good place to be. Jesus says he will vomit you up. But Jesus is patient, and he pleads with us. It is not enough to simply admit that you are a sinner and then expect the world to deal with it. Rather, Jesus tells us that if we really are poor, naked, and blind then we are to do something about it. “Buy from me,” He says.

But how do you buy gold and raiment and eye salve when you are as poor as the Bible says you are?

Isaiah answers this question for us: “Ho! Everyone who thirsts, come to the waters; and you who have no money, come, buy and eat. Yes, come, buy wine and milk without money and without price. Why do you spend money for what is not bread, and your wages for what does not satisfy? Listen carefully to me, and eat what is good, and let your soul delight itself in abundance” (Isa. 55:1–2).

Our fallen nature uses all of the wealth that we think we have to purchase those things that we think will quench our thirst. But the only thing that can cover our nakedness, quench our thirst, and make us rich is offered to us for free.

We seek to alleviate powerlessness and loneliness through adultery and fornication, because we refuse to see that Jesus was forsaken by all so that we might never be alone.

We covet and steal because we have forgotten that Jesus gave up the riches of heaven so that we may become richer than we can even imagine.

We fight and cause division and strife in order to gain recognition, acceptance, and significance, because we forget that He was outcast as a criminal, made himself of no reputation, and was crucified among thieves so that we might be “accepted in the Beloved.”

We are anxious and full of worry about the future because we forget that He rose from the dead and is even now sitting at the right hand of God, ruling over all things for the good of the church.

We have not, because we ask not. We ask not because we think we are rich, and in need of nothing.

This disease is prevalent: none of us is immune. It is deadly: we cannot believe that we have need of nothing and have any part in Christ. It is deceptive: we don’t even know how pervasive it is in our own souls.

But Jesus will never allow any of his sheep to perish. Therefore He says, “As many as I love, I rebuke and chasten: be zealous therefore, and repent.”

Since the disease is common to every child of Adam, the cure is applied to every member of Christ: it is through much tribulation that we enter the kingdom of heaven. It is through tribulation and trials that we learn by the grace of God just how miserable, wretched, poor, blind, and naked we really are. It is when those trials that we cannot solve come upon us that we understand how utterly lacking in wisdom we really are. It is only when the armies of Sennacherib surround us that we realize our helplessness and danger. Only when we are brought face to face with giants do we fall on our faces and cry out, “Lord, save us!”

But we are also stubborn. Our tendency is to refuse the yoke and kick against the pricks. So Jesus says, “Repent.” In other words, stop thinking the way that you normally think and remember the promises of God. In hard times, our tendency is to complain, doubting God’s goodness. We struggle letting our idols go. We still think that we can fix this if only we were smarter, wiser, or better people. It is precisely this that Jesus commands us to repent from. For the bread that we seek is free. The clothing that we need is free. The wisdom that we so desperately long for is free.

God brings us face to face with giants that are so formidable that we have no weapons that are any match against them. We have no armies coming over the hills to back us up. We have no strategy that will overcome. Retreat is impossible. Advance is suicide. We stand on the mountain with Barak and a host of farmers with sticks, while the valley below is full of chariots of iron, undefeatable soldiers and horses without number. What can be done? Why does God bring us to that point?

He brings us to that point because He loves us. He calls us to quit thinking that we are smart enough, strong enough, and rich enough to overcome anything. As long as we say that we are rich and in need of nothing, we will never know the strength of Jesus Christ, our King.

Jesus uses a figure of speech to plead with us (v 20). This passage does not speak of the universal call of the gospel. He is not saying to “invite Jesus into your hearts.” That sentiment is meaningless and foreign to the text. He is speaking to the ones whom he loves (v 19) that would rather dine alone on the empty waste of their own wisdom and strength than admit their nakedness and fall before their king. He is speaking to those in the churches with rich heritages who are too wise, too righteous, and too astute to need a savior.

He is not unwilling to save. He is standing at the door and knocking. He is pleading with the church to stop spending their money on that which isn’t bread, and open the door.

The Reformed churches have a rich heritage. But something happened. The seminaries began to turn out pastors who were too wise to need a resurrected savior. They were too righteous to need a crucified Lord. They were too strong to need an ascended Christ. These pastors infected the churches. They denied the resurrection, the incarnation, and eventually denied that Jesus ever existed at all. Soon the sound of knocking became the sound of retching, and Jesus vomited them up, just as He promised. The landscape of Europe and the United States became littered with useless, vain, empty churches that once proudly proclaimed their rich heritage. The dead fly of human wisdom and strength caused the ointment to stink, and Jesus removed the candlestick.

But for all who open the door, who remember their poverty and wretchedness, Jesus makes a tremendous promise. He will come in and dine with them.

Only when we are in fellowship with Christ can we soar with eagles’ wings. And we can only be in fellowship with Christ if we never forget that we ourselves are wretched, miserable, poor, blind, and naked. But when we come to Christ again in our poverty and need, we find that we do not dine alone. Indeed, he prepares a table for us even in the presence of our enemies, and causes us to rest safely in green pastures.

When we are in fellowship with Christ, we are truly flesh of his flesh and bone of his bones. His death was our death. The law has no more hold on us, for we have been crucified with him. His resurrection is our resurrection. We are no longer in bondage to the curse for we have been raised again to new life. And His triumph is our triumph. Where the head goes, the body goes. So He says, “To him who overcomes I will grant to sit with Me on My throne, as I also overcame and sat down with My Father on His throne” (Rev. 3:21).

This is our rich heritage. Victory is not in our wisdom, our strength, or the ingenuity of our fig leaves, but only in the mercy of Christ. It isn’t in “accepting Jesus into your heart,” whatever that means. It isn’t in masses, submission to the pope, or confession to a priest. It isn’t in the rituals of the church, nor is it in military strength.

Victory only lies in falling down again before our Lord and crying out, “Lord, have mercy on me, a sinner.” 

<< Start < Prev 1 2 3 4 5 Next > End >>
Page 1 of 5