Nov. 2008

Nov. 2008 (4)

Thursday, 21 April 2011 20:58

What Kind of Faith Do You Have?

Written by Paul Henderson

"What kind of faith do (you say) you have?" (James 2: 14-17)

The book of James is a book in sermon-like format that has set before us in many different ways-about our faith. "Our faith," as in, not only what we believe, but especially our faith, in terms of what and in whom we are to place our trust, hope, and very lives in! Faith, as in our deepest of convictions, should determine how we live in our day to day relationship with God our Father, and the Lord and Savior Jesus Christ, as well as with each other.

In regard to the testing or trying of our faith, in chapter 1: 2-3 James wrote: "My brethren, count it all joy when you fall into various trials, knowing that the testing of your faith produces patience (endurance)."

Concerning actually trusting God to give us the wisdom we all so desperately need, he writes in verses 5-6: "If any of you lacks wisdom, let him ask of God, who gives to all liberally and without reproach, and it will be given to him. But let him ask in faith, with no doubting...."

Defining what true religion or ‘faith in Christ' is, in verses 26-27, he reminds us: If anyone among you thinks he is religious, and does not bridle his tongue but deceives his own heart, this one's religion (or faith) is useless. Pure and undefiled religion before God and the Father is this: to visit the orphans and widows in their trouble, and to keep oneself unspotted from the world."

Lastly, in chapter 2: 1-13, we are exhorted not to hold the faith of our Lord Jesus Christ with partiality, that is, we are not to say or claim that we have faith in this Lord of glory, and then do the contrary, by showing ungodly favoritism toward anyone, and especially the poor or the least of His brethren. If Christians are followers of Christ, we ought also to walk just as He walked (I John 2: 6).

Evaluation of Our Faith

And so, is it any wonder that when we come to verses 14-26, James once again calls upon us to consider our faith? We must evaluate our profession of faith and check ourselves by asking ourselves, "What kind of faith do we have?" Therefore, James in this passage, combats that slothful and slipshod practice of saying one thing and doing another thing! He challenges those who may be deceiving themselves into thinking that they have true faith, when in truth, their faith is empty or barren. Dead on arrival!

Basically, our Lord is calling us to be Christians: to be Christians in name, in word, in deed, and in all truth and sincerity. "What kind of faith do you say you have?" Is it an ‘alive in Christ' faith? A living faith? Is it a profitable faith that brings forth fruit so that others might know that you are is what you say you are?

Truly, with God Almighty, there are to be no pretenders! No shysters of religion! There is no room for a heady or intellectual kind of faith, or a secret sophisticated orthodoxy! We either have true faith or you have a dead faith! We are either in Christ, or we are not! We are either fulfilling the royal law according to Scripture-loving God and our neighbor as ourselves-or we are not. There can be no happy medium when it comes to holding to faith in our Lord Jesus Christ!

Once again James sets the context, or the mind-set, that he saw in his day, and with which the Church of Jesus Christ, and every body of believers who ever existed, has had to face. And he does so by asking a couple of questions that he expects all true Christians to answer in the negative!

Our Profession

"What does it profit, my brethren, if someone says he has faith but does not have works? Can faith save him?" (2:14) What is he asking here?

If someone claims that he has faith, and he holds for truth all that God has revealed to him in the

Holy Scriptures, if he talks a good game, if he knows all the right words, the right scriptures and has the catechism memorized, and can give a good answer in regard to the facts of God and salvation-but, if he has nothing to show for it, that is, he or she does not live it, and has no heartfelt trust in the truths of God, of Christ and His saving work, then what does this kind of faith profit? What does this "head knowledge" faith profit him or any body else? Nothing! Again, note, James is supposing that someone is claiming that he has faith, but in reality, he has no fruit or ‘good works' and no evidence to back it up!

Then he asks, "Can this kind of ‘faith' save him?" Does this kind of a faith prove that he or she is a Christian, when this faith is known only in words or in a profession of faith? Is this saving faith? No! For lip service alone can never save an individual! This kind of ‘faith' is not true faith!

"This verse is a pronouncement of the practicality of the Christian faith. Christianity is not getting a few notions into our heads, but it is a change of the seat of all our affections and dispositions, a change of the heart." (Spiros Zodhiates) This is a change that demonstrate that Christ indeed has gotten a hold of us and we of Him!

What is true faith? "True faith is not only a sure or certain knowledge whereby I hold for truth all that God has revealed to me in His Word, BUT ALSO, a hearty trust, which the Holy Spirit works in me by the Gospel, that not only to others, but to me also, forgiveness of sins, everlasting righteousness and salvation are freely given by God, merely of grace, only for the sake of Christ's merits." (HC Q20) And because of this, HC Q64 teaches, it is impossible that those who are implanted into Christ by true faith should not bring forth fruits of thankfulness.

How Faith Works

James shows what he means by giving an example of what this ‘professing only faith' looks like.

"If a brother or sister is naked and destitute of daily food ... (2:15) This is a brother or sister in the Lord, a fellow believer who is truly in need of the basics of life. "Naked" here means without a decent set of clothes to cover their Body."Destitute of daily food", means that he is without a daily portion of food (without enough food for even one day), "and one of you says to them,"Depart in peace, be warmed and filled," (2:16) This means, "O may the Lord bless you and keep you, or go with God in peace and be warmed and be filled"; (that is, I pray the Lord will make you warm, and somehow brings you a decent pair of pants and a coat, or I pray the Lord give you your daily bread, a bowl of rice or a sandwich.")

In other words, if this professing one only gives to them in word only, but does not give to them the things that are truly needed for the body, what does it profit?

How does this kind of a faith profit anyone-You or them, or the glory of God? It doesn't! Rather it brings shame, dishonor and reproach upon the name of the Lord! It demonstrates a basic lack of love for your brother or sister in the Lord! How can this kind of faith be considered genuine? It cannot! This person's faith has failed the truth and sincerity test! He cannot possibly claim that he has the love of God in his heart (real faith) if he does not manifest it toward his own destitute brothers and sisters.

Here are a few questions that we must ask ourselves: Is this the kind of ‘faith' we have? Is this what ‘our profession of faith' looks like to the world in which we live? Do we even want to know the ‘naked and hungry' brethren in our midst?

To say to someone in need that God will provide the needed clothes and the needed daily bread, when we can perfectly well provide for them ourselves, is making mockery of the name of God. "Sometimes instead of going to our closet of prayer, we might better go to our clothes closet and to our pantry and then visit some of our poor brethren!" (S. Zodhiates)

In verse 17, James also concludes, that "faith by itself (alone), if it does not have works, is dead." This kind of a ‘professing faith' by itself is just as useless or barren as telling someone in need to be warmed and filled!

Then James further adds to his point by using a ‘dramatization' so to speak. He pictures someone in the congregation rising up and speaking to the body supporting his claim and so he writes: "But someone will say. ‘You have faith, and I have works.' Show me your faith without your works, and I will show you my faith by my works." (2:18)

In other words, this supposed supporter says: "You who say that you have faith, you profess Christ well and good, and I have works, that is, I live out my faith! So prove to me your ‘profession of faith' without works, without evidence.

And I will demonstrate to you that my faith, the faith that I profess is real, because you will see it in my works! You will see evidence of the saving grace of Jesus Christ at work within me! But you have no real evidence to back up your professed faith! I see none! There is no evidence of the grace of God in Christ at work within you! Where's the fruit? You say you are this and that you believe in this or that-"Where's the proof?"

Many are those who profess Christ, who may recite the Apostles' Creed, and even say it with gusto! They may sing with fervor and pray with all pretense of being sincere; but what good is it if their faith, their hope in Christ is not a hearty trust? There is not a doing of God's word? or a desire to love Him and their neighbor? (See Matthew 7: 21-23; Matthew 21: 28-32)

James then proclaims: "You believe that there is one God. You do well. Even the demons believe and tremble!" (2:19)

Indeed, he tells the scattered saints, that even the evil angels and wicked spirits who are outside of Christ, and who are subject to the curse and condemnation of God, truly believe that there is one God! But what does their kind of ‘faith' result in? They are terrified by Him because there is no real love and trust in God their Creator! Theirs is not a living, loving kind of a faith! Their kind of faith is a fruitless ‘believing faith' that leads them and keeps them forever bound to their sins and rebelliousness and under the judgment and condemnation of the Holy One! (See Mark 1: 23-24 ; 3: 11 & Luke 8: 28, 33.)

Is this the kind of faith we desire? ... that we want? ... that we have? A faith that certainly professes, "I believe in God the Father, Almighty Maker of heaven and earth", but then trembles, and runs in terror at the sound of His voice? He professes to know this "Father" until all trouble or ‘evil' breaks loose? He talks of his or her faith in this Father, but who, in reality, lives a life of utter carelessness and sinful laziness in the face of the Almighty God?

What Kind of Faith Do You Have?

Hear what God through James has to say to all who think and live so foolishly: "But do you want to know, O foolish man, that faith without works is dead?" (2:20)

This is the truth of all who foolishly sport with God! Who make their profession of faith in God with nice sounding words and statements; who say the right things, and who make the biblically correct pronouncements, but who in reality are far away from Him! For their kind of ‘faith' is a dead faith-a faith that has only remained within the mind or mouth, but has never truly been set in the soul, or embraced by the heart!

What kind of faith do you have? When you and I profess together, "I believe," how far or deep does that belief go? Is it far and deep enough to be seen, felt and known by others? Is it profitable to others? What glory does it bring God, the Father, the Almighty Maker of heaven and earth?

Dear readers, if you would truly believe, if you would truly embrace Jesus Christ, and place all your trust in Him, and if you would have true faith, then you must embrace Jesus Christ with a hearty trust! If there are any of you reading this article that truly know that you have thus far only professed Christ with the lip or with the mouth; indeed, with a right and good sounding mouth or profession, but you know that God is revealing to you that your faith is only an empty or barren profession, then your heart has not been captivated by the love of God in Christ.

If so, I strongly urge you to call upon Jesus Christ to save you from this empty or dead faith and fruit-less profession! Call upon Him to so work in you by the word preached today and through the power of His Holy Spirit-that you might receive the right kind of faith! Saving faith! A faith and a trust or hope that really changes you! That makes you a new creature in Christ, and that will therefore cause you to produce fruits of righteousness for His name's sake! He will hear your plea! He will hear your prayer! For dear readers, He is in the business of saving men, women and children! It is His delight to so work in you, that you will so walk after Him!

Also, for all who have made a profession of their faith; and yet it is a faith that has withered or lost its moisture, whose fruits are languishing upon a mere dusty profession of faith, then your Lord desires to see His grace at work within you, showing forth the fruits of His mercy and love! Call out to Him this day then and confess your sins to Him, crying out to Him: "Lord I do want to be a Christian, and not only in my profession or with my lips alone, but also and especially in my heart and life!" "Lord I want to be like Jesus!" I want the kind of faith that demonstrates itself with deeds of love and mercy so that others might see Christ in me!

May the profession that I make with my lips on a Sunday morning be the same proclamation that is manifested or seen in my life throughout the week!

This is the kind of "faith" that we all should want. This is the kind of faith that is to be proclaimed and believed within our own hearts-within the Body of Christ and unto a lost and sin-cursed world. May God so grant us this living faith, this truly saving faith.

Thursday, 21 April 2011 20:55

What Happened At Pentecost?

Written by Hank Bowen

Historical Background Leading Up to Pentecost

To understand the true empowerment with which the Church has been equipped, one must take the time to thoroughly understand the significance of what happened on the day of Pentecost just after Jesus' ascension into heaven.

A good starting point in any study is to recognize that with God nothing happens by chance. God's plan of redemption is historically and progressively revealed throughout the Old Testament, reaching its fullness with the first advent of our Lord Jesus Christ. As such no detail should be overlooked but studied with the understanding that the providence of God is operative at every point in the Bible's revelation of the plan of salvation.

With this in view, the study of what happened in Jerusalem on the Day of Pentecost, when the promised gift of the pouring out of the Holy Spirit was realized, begins with an appreciation for the origin of the festival and its significance for God's covenant people.

The term Pentecost literally means the fiftieth day and thus began fifty days after Passover on the first day of the week. In Exodus 23:14-16, Pentecost, also known as the feast of weeks or harvest, is listed as one of the three great feasts in which all of the men were to appear to offer worship to God. The one day Pentecost feast in particular was observed to celebrate the end of the barley and wheat harvest season. The first-fruits of the harvest were to be brought into the temple as a thank offering for God's provision.

The feast is actually tied to the offering on the third day, the first day of the week after the Passover, when the first harvest sheaves were offered, marking the beginning of the harvest season. But none of the fresh harvest was to be eaten until after the Pentecost offering when the season for the thank offerings for God's blessing began.

The harvest festivals served as a symbol of God's grace in bringing the Hebrews into the promised land, and giving to them the fruit of a land for which they had not labored. The celebration was to be in view over the course of the seven weeks, ending in the Pentecost celebration in which the people acknowledged that God had provided the fruit from the harvest. In other words, it was a picture of God's grace in giving them all that they had, particularly in the context of deliverance from exile into the promised land and life, spiritually of redemption and resurrection unto life.

Pentecost's Effects Today

For the Christian church, Pentecost marks the day when the promise of the Father spoken of in Acts 1:4 is realized. Jesus' final recorded words before His ascension into heaven declared that the promise of the pouring out of the Holy Spirit was going to happen within the next few days in Jerusalem. This promise of the pouring out of the Holy Spirit was not a new concept for Israel. Peter points to Joel 2:28 as the promise being fulfilled before the festival participants gathered in Jerusalem and witnessed this epochal event in redemptive history.

The promise of the pouring out of the Holy Spirit was prominent in Jesus' own ministry. In Acts 1:4, He instructs the disciples to remain in Jerusalem until the promise of the Father, which you have heard from Me has happened. That promise Jesus explains is the baptism of the Holy Spirit.

On several occasions Jesus' had made promises to the disciples about the coming of the Holy Spirit. It is of no little importance that upon the event of Jesus' own baptism by John the Baptist, marking the beginning of Jesus' ministry that John declared, "I indeed baptize you with water; but One mightier than I is coming, whose sandal strap I am not worthy to loose. He will baptize you with the Holy Spirit and fire." (Luke 3:17) This baptism of the Holy Spirit, however, is not part of Jesus' three year ministry. Rather it is to be the fruit of His obedience and redemptive sacrifice for which He was anointed by John.

Throughout Jesus' instruction there are numerous times that He declares the promise of the coming of the Holy Spirit in a greater and more distinct way. He speaks of His sending, or the Holy Spirit being sent by the Father in His name, to teach, comfort and lead the disciples (Luke 12:2, John 14:26, 16:13). But that this was to wait until after Jesus' earthly ministry is apparent from John 16:7, where Jesus declares, "Nevertheless, I tell you the truth. It is to your advantage that I go away; for if I do not go away, the Helper will not come to you; but if I depart, I will send Him to you."

Keeping this in mind then, up to the day of Pentecost, the Spirit is essentially a future promise yet to be realized in the minds of the disciples. But after Pentecost the emphasis turns to the present reality of the gift of the Holy Spirit poured out and active in the church, enabling the saints to do the work of missionary outreach to all the nations.

Pentecost and the Mission of the Church

So in asking the question of what happened at Pentecost, the focus should not be so much on the individual recipients of the gift, but on the centrality of the One who is giving that gift as the enjoyment of the fruit of His work of redemption and the significance of His resurrection and ascension.

The Pentecost event can only be rightly understood when viewed through the thematic purpose laid out for the New Testament church by our Lord just before He ascended into heaven. In Acts 1:8, Jesus declares, "But you shall receive power when the Holy Spirit has come upon you; and you shall be witnesses to Me in Jerusalem, and in all Judea and Samaria, and to the end of the earth." As such Jesus' declaration is intimately tied to the great commission in Matthew 28, where our Lord states, "All authority has been given to Me in heaven and on earth. Go therefore and make disciples of all nations. . ." The point being that this particular pouring out of the Holy Spirit as the promise of the Father was specifically to equip the church to carry out the grand calling to evangelize the world with the gospel of Jesus Christ as the only name by which sinners can be saved.

As such, the focus of the pouring out of the Holy Spirit is not to be on the "gifts" of the Spirit, but on the "gift" of the Holy Spirit poured out on the whole church represented by the disciples gathered together as a whole in Jerusalem. The "gift" of the Holy Spirit is designed to bring the body of Christ together with a unified purpose to effectively carry out the mission of the church in proclaiming to the gospel to all nations.

The unique ability to speak in other or foreign tongues was not for the benefit of the individual speaking in a foreign tongue, but for the purpose of proclamation of the gospel to those from other nations as a demonstration that salvation was no longer to be only of the Jews. Pentecost was an expression of God's intention to open the church up at this time to include not only Jewish believers but ultimately the Gentiles as well.

All of this is accomplished because Christ, as the head of the church, sends His life-giving Spirit to dwell within the believer and enjoin him to the church and its mission. The Spirit then is the presence of Christ in the midst of His church. As such, the New Testament church is the continuation of the ministry of Christ here on earth until the final day of judgment. In this sense, what happened at Pentecost is the baptism of the church with the Holy Spirit as the crowning achievement of Christ's work. It is our Lord Jesus Christ's joy in the harvest of all for whom He has died and to all to whom He imparts the gift of eternal life. Thus, Jesus is the first-fruit of the resurrection of all that He will raise up on the last day.

Thursday, 21 April 2011 20:47

I Believe in the Holy Spirit

Written by Michael Voytek

As you are probably aware, there is a branch of Protestant Christianity that identifies itself primarily with the person and work of the Holy Spirit. They choose to call themselves "Pentecostal" or "Charismatic" because they either desire to emphasize the importance of the coming of the Holy Spirit at Pentecost (believing also that this is a reoccurring event even to the present day) or because they desire to emphasize the importance of the ongoing gifting (charismata) of the Holy Spirit (especially concerning the extraordinary gifts of speaking in strange tongues and miracles). Furthermore, many times when they are speaking to members of different Protestant churches, they will bring up the importance of this emphasis and express their concern that other churches fail to focus on the person and especially on the ongoing work of the Holy Spirit. The author has met some who even go so far as to say that unless you have experienced the presence and power of the Holy Spirit in your life (signified by speaking in strange tongues), you are not saved. How would you answer their claim or their critique concerning this lack of emphasis in the life and teaching of most Protestant churches, including the Reformed Church?

A number of responses come to mind. One could respond by critiquing the doctrine and teaching of those churches. Or reference could be made to church history and the rise of various heretical groups and movements that made similar claims. As a matter of fact, one of the most amusing responses in history is attributed to Martin Luther. In his dealings with the radical reformers such as Thomas Muntzer, who like many modern day Pentecostals and Charismatics emphasized the direct presence and guidance of the Holy Spirit without the necessity of Holy Scripture, Luther exclaimed that he acted as if he had "swallowed the Holy Ghost, feathers and all!'" Instead of developing a negative response, I would like us to consider one of the most concise and powerful positive responses that can be found in the universal church. It is simply the statement found in the Apostles Creed, namely "I believe in the Holy Spirit". Although Roman Catholics, Greek Orthodox, and Protestant churches all profess this belief, I would like to concentrate on how we as Biblical Christians (B. B. Warfield referred to Reformed theology as simply Biblical Christianity come into its own) understand what we are confessing in this affirmation. To make it more interesting, I would like to ask you a personal question, "What do you understand and believe when you publicly confess with God's people that "I believe in the Holy Spirit"?

Hopefully, as you were formulating your answer, you thought of the succinct statement found in question #53 of the Heidelberg Catechism. In answer to the question, "What dost thou believe concerning the Holy Ghost?" we read, "First, that He is co-eternal God with the Father and the Son. Secondly, that He is also given unto me; makes me by a true faith partaker of Christ and all His benefits; comforts me; and shall abide with me forever." Although this answer emphasizes two points, first concerning the person of the Holy Spirit and secondly concerning His work, it is important to note that imbedded in the second point is the marvelous truth that the Holy Spirit is personally involved with each and every believer. Don't you find great comfort and encouragement knowing that He "has been given to me", "makes me a partaker of Christ and all His benefits", "comforts me", and "shall abide with me forever"? Or maybe you thought of Heidelberg Catechism question #1 where in addition to the comfort of knowing that you belong to your faithful Savior Jesus Christ, you understand that "by His Holy Spirit, He also assures me of eternal life, and makes me heartily willing and ready henceforth to live unto Him."

What does it mean that we confess that the Holy Spirit "is co-eternal God with the Father and the Son?" Again we could turn to another of the confessions of our church, namely the Belgic Confession, in order to discover a fuller explanation. For example, in Article 11, titled The Holy Spirit is True and Eternal God ,we read the following; "We believe and confess also that the Holy Spirit from eternity proceeds from the Father and the Son; and therefore neither is made, created, nor begotten, but only proceeds from both; who in order is the third person of the Holy Trinity; of one and the same essence, majesty, and glory with the Father and the Son; and therefore is the true and eternal God, as the Holy Scriptures teach us." The Holy Spirit is not an influence or a force, but the personal God, eternal in nature, equal to the Father and the Son. He is one who can be grieved (Ephesians 4:30) and lied to (Acts 5:3-4), as well as one who teaches (John 14:26), testifies (John 15:26), reproves (John 16:8), etc.

If I were to ask you to name the teacher in the history of the church who is known as "The Theologian of the Holy Spirit", what would be your answer? Would it surprise you to learn that it was none other than John Calvin? Why is that so? The great Princeton theologian B. B. Warfield justified his attributing this title to Calvin in an article titled Calvin as a Theologian. Here is an excerpt from that article. "It is probable, however, that Calvin's greatest contribution to theological science lies in the rich development which he gives-and which he was the first to give-to the doctrine of the work of the Holy Spirit. No doubt, from the origin of Christianity, everyone who has been even slightly imbued with the Christian spirit has believed in the Holy Spirit as the author and giver of life, and has attributed all that is good in the world, and particularly in himself, to His holy offices. And, of course, in the treatment of grace, Augustine worked out the doctrine of salvation as a subjective experience with great vividness and in great detail, and the whole course of this salvation was fully understood, no doubt, to be the work of the Holy Spirit. But in the same sense in which we may say that the doctrine of sin and grace dates from Augustine, the doctrine of satisfaction from Anselm, the doctrine of justification by faith from Luther-we must say that the doctrine of the work of the Holy Spirit is a gift from Calvin to the Church. It was he who first related the whole experience of salvation specifically to the working of the Holy Spirit, worked it out into its details, and contemplated its several steps and stages in orderly progression as the product of the Holy Spirit's specific work in applying salvation to the soul. Thus he gave systematic and adequate expression to the whole doctrine of the Holy Spirit and made it the assured possession of the Church of God." Warfield concludes his article with the following: "Here then is probably Calvin's greatest contribution to theological development. In his hands, for the first time in the history of the Church, the doctrine of the Holy Spirit comes to its rights. Into the heart of none more than into his did the vision of the glory of God shine, and no one has been more determined than he not to give the glory of God to another. Who has been more devoted than he to the Saviour, by whose blood he has been bought? But, above everything else, it is the sense of the sovereign working of salvation by the almighty power of the Holy Spirit which characterizes all Calvin's thought of God. And above everything else he deserves, therefore, the great name of the theologian of the Holy Spirit."

We, of the Reformed Church, who identify John Calvin as one of our spiritual fathers and teachers, should rejoice that we have such a rich heritage of teaching concerning the person and work of the Holy Spirit. The question that could be raised at this point is, "did this emphasis of Calvin impact the subsequent generations of Reformed believers, even down to the present day?" The answer is a definite yes! This can be demonstrated in a number of ways but we will limit our focus to a perusal of the third document that we declare to be one of our doctrinal standards, namely the Canons of Dort. Though they were written over 50 years after the death of John Calvin, yet his influence and emphasis lived on in them.

Have you ever noticed that the structure of the Canons of Dort reflect the structure of Calvin's Institutes of the Christian Religion? Just as Calvin structured his Institutes around the three persons of the Godhead (Book 1 concerning God the Father, Book 2 concerning God the Son, and Books 3 & 4 concerning God the Holy Spirit), so also did the delegates at the Synod of Dort. The Canon's first head of doctrine focuses on the election by God the Father, the second head focuses on the redemption by God the Son, and the next three heads upon the application of Christ's redemption by the Holy Spirit. This was not by accident, but on purpose. With this structure in mind, we will concentrate on the last three heads of doctrine.

In The Third and Fourth Heads of Doctrine: The Corruption of Man, His Conversion to God, And the Manner Thereof, the Synod first established the greatness of our need of God's saving intervention due to our total depravity or total inability. Then beginning in Article 6, they point us to the means by which God sovereignly intervenes to save His elect. "What, therefore, neither the innate understanding nor the law could do, that God performs by the operation of the Holy Spirit through the word or ministry of reconciliation; which is the glad tidings concerning the Messiah, by means whereof it has pleased God to save such as believe, as well under the Old as under the New Testament." Notice that it is due to the "operation" or activity of the Holy Spirit that one is saved. Turning to Article 11 we find their attempt to explain in detail what this "operation" entails; "But when God accomplishes His good pleasure in the elect, or works in them true conversion, He not only causes the gospel to be externally preached to them, and powerfully illuminates their minds by His Holy Spirit, that they may rightly understand and discern the things of the Spirit of God; but by the efficacy of the same regenerating Spirit He pervades the inmost recesses of man; He opens the closed and softens the hardened heart, and circumcises that which was uncircumcised; infuses new qualities into the will, which, though heretofore dead, He quickens; from being evil, disobedient, and refractory, He renders it good, obedient, and pliable; actuates and strengthens it, that like a good tree, it may bring forth the fruits of good actions."

An excellent word that could be used to summarize this point is the word "regeneration". But notice that they were not satisfied with simply labeling it, but rather were overwhelmed by the wonder of this work of grace and mercy by the Holy Spirit. Thus in Article 12 we read, "And this is that regeneration so highly extolled in Scripture, that renewal, new creation, resurrection from the dead, making alive, which God works in us without our aid. But this is in no wise effected merely by the external preaching of the gospel, by moral suasion, or such a mode of operation that, after God has performed His part, it still remains in the power of man to be regenerated or not, to be converted or to continue unconverted; but it is evidently a supernatural work, most powerful, and at the same time most delightful, astonishing, mysterious, and ineffable; not inferior in efficacy to creation or the resurrection from the dead, as the Scripture inspired by the Author of this work declares; so that all in whose heart God works in this marvelous manner are certainly, infallibly, and effectually regenerated, and do actually believe." As the Prophet Jonah learned the hard way in the belly of the great fish-salvation is of the Lord!

The Holy Spirit is not only the active agent in the initial act of the application of saving work of Christ, but he abides with the regenerate person, continuing His work of sanctification. Furthermore, it is He who ultimately perseveres on behalf of the saint. Thus we find that the Synod declared that it was important to include the ongoing presence and work of the Holy Spirit in their final head of doctrine titled The Perseverance of the Saints. It is there we are taught that by our sins we "grieve the Holy Spirit" (Article 5) and yet God "does not wholly withdraw the Holy Spirit from His own people even in their grievous falls" (Article 6). On the contrary, "in these falls He preserves in them the incorruptible seed of regeneration from perishing or being totally lost; and again, by His Word and Spirit He certainly and effectually renews them to repentance, to a sincere and godly sorrow for their sins, that they may seek and obtain remission in the blood of the Mediator, may again experience the favor of a reconciled God, through faith adore His mercies, and henceforward more diligently work out their own salvation with fear and trembling" (Article 7). Furthermore, we learn of "the sealing of the Holy Spirit" (Article 8), of "the testimony of the Holy Spirit, witnessing with our spirit that we are children and heirs of God (Article 10), and of the encouragement of the Holy Spirit who gives us "the comfortable assurance of persevering" (article 11) to give us a future and a hope. All of these aspects of the ongoing work of the Holy Spirit that are found in the Canons of Dort were not newly discovered by the delegates of Synod but were previously taught by John Calvin as a examination of Books 3 and 4 in his Institutes will verify.

So where does this leave the 21st century Reformed Christian when confronted with the claims of our Pentecostal or Charismatic brethren? Are we destitute of the presence and work of the Holy Spirit because we do not expect "extraordinary signs and wonders" nor speak in strange tongues? On the contrary, we glory in the knowledge of the powerful, sovereign work of the Spirit in His application of the finished work of Christ to our daily lives. We stand in awe of the sovereign power of the Holy Spirit as He is pleased to take dead men and women (Ephesians 2:1-5) and to raise them to life (regeneration) through our meager attempts at sharing the gospel (Romans 1:16). As we consider our own state in Adam prior to the intervention of His grace (total depravity), thanksgiving and praise arise in our hearts and flow from our lips. It is truly amazing grace, how sweet the sound, that saved a wretch like me! Furthermore, when we find ourselves struggling against the lust of the flesh, the lust of the eyes, and the pride of life (1 John 2:16, Romans 7:14-24), we know that we not alone but that the Spirit of holiness abides with us and enables us to walk in the Spirit and not to fulfill the lust of the flesh (Gal. 5:16; Romans 8:9-16). Again, we are not left alone to try and figure out how to conduct our life in this world but have been given an abiding Comforter (John 14:16), even the Spirit of truth (John 14:17, 15:26, 16:13), whom Christ said "shall teach you all things, and bring all things to your remembrance, whatsoever I have said unto you (John 14:26). And finally, as the Apostle Paul so marvelously declared, it is by the Spirit of the Lord that "we all, with open face beholding as in a glass the glory of the Lord, are changed into the same image from glory to glory" (2 Cor. 3:18). Therefore "being confident of this very thing, that he which hath begun a good work in you will perform it until the day of Jesus Christ" (Phil. 1:6), let us rejoice and give glory to God and confess to all who will listen, that we "believe in the Holy Spirit."

Thursday, 21 April 2011 20:40

You Are What You Eat

Written by James Snyder

The phrase "you are what you eat", not to be confused with the cannibal's dictum, "you eat what you are", may have had its origin with Ludwig Feuerbach, a German philosopher, in his 1863 essay entitled Concerning Spiritualism and Materialism, where he wrote: "Der Mensch ist, was er isst". The English translation is ‘man is what he eats'. Feuerbach was using an alliteration between the German words ‘to be" and ‘to eat' which sound similar. Prior to Feuerbach, a French lawyer who was a gourmet, wrote a book in 1825 called The Physiology of Taste. In that book, Brillat-Savarin wrote: "Tell me what you eat and I'll tell you what you are". Now, neither of these men meant for their quotes to be taken literally. They were referring to how the food one eats can have a bearing on their minds and health. The phrase wasn't used in English until the 1920-30's when a nutritionist named Victor Lindlahr developed the idea that food controls health. He wrote a book in 1942 called You Are What You Eat; how to win and keep health with diet. I read recently about a man who had eaten 23,000 Big Mac hamburgers since 1972. He had two each day except for a few rare instances which prevented him from doing so. Now, I'm sure that this man doesn't look like a Big Mac, at least on the outside. But with my professional background in nutrition, I would be confident in saying that eating that many Big Macs has had some effect on his health.

Spiritual Food

Now, you may be thinking, "Why am I reading about nutrition in a theological publication?" Well, I want to argue that the idea of eating and nutrition can be used metaphorically to apply to spiritual matters and in fact has been done so by Jesus and others in the Bible. I want to demonstrate that the phrase "you are what you eat" can be applied to our spiritual health and growth. In John's gospel, chapter six, Jesus calls Himself the bread of life. He also says that "unless you eat the flesh of the Son of man, and drink his blood, you have no life in you" (6:53). In verse 55 He says, "For my flesh is food indeed, and my blood is drink indeed." Now, Jesus is speaking metaphorically or figuratively, but that wasn't so obvious to some of his followers who thought he was teaching some kind of cannibalism. It was a "hard saying" for them and they left. Jesus had begun the discourse by saying that He was the bread of life and that all who came to Him and believed in Him had life. There's the literal meaning. Jesus is talking about believing in Him. Later He decides to use the figurative language in what someone has called Jesus' "church shrinkage program". Rome also seems somewhat confused by using these verses and other sources to promote their ritualistic cannibalism in their doctrine of transubstantiation, for that is what it is if the elements truly become the flesh and blood of Christ. The inability to discern between literal and figurative language seems to be a continual source of confusion for many throughout church history.

Paul, in 1 Corinthians 3:1-2 says, "And, I, brethren, could not speak to you as spiritual people but as to carnal, as to babes in Christ. I fed you with milk and not with solid food; for until now you were not able to receive it, and even now you are still not able." The writer to the Hebrews uses similar language in Hebrews 5:12-14, which states, "For though by this time you ought to be teachers, you need someone to teach you again the first principles of the oracles of God; and you have come to need milk and not solid food. For everyone who partakes only of milk is unskilled in the word of righteousness, for he is a babe. But solid food belongs to those who are of full age, that is, those who by reason of use have their senses exercised to discern both good and evil." Peter also says, "...as newborn babes, desire the pure milk of the word, that you may grow thereby". (1Peter 2:2). From these passages we see the Bible's use of figurative language using the idea of eating and nutrition to discuss spiritual life and growth.

This gastronomic idea may be connected to Proverbs 23:7; "For as he thinks in his heart, so is he." What we think will define what we are. This connects us with the verses in Romans, Colossians, Ephesians and 2 Peter that connect our minds or our thinking with our behavior and living. Paul exhorts us to not be conformed to the world but be transformed by the renewal of our minds. He says similar things in Ephesians and Colossians about how we grow in the faith by knowledge of the truth... "being renewed in the spirit of your mind" ... "and have put on the new man who is renewed in knowledge according to the image of Him who created him." So as we grow in our understanding and belief of God's Truth, that will have a greater effect over our lives and we will bear more fruit to God's glory.

Let's get back to the gastronomic analogy. If what we eat physically becomes us via the digestive process and effects the health and growth of our bodies, likewise what we eat spiritually will affect the health and growth of our souls. So, if we eat junk food (food which is edible but has little nutritive quality) and have little nutritious food in our diets, our health will suffer. Likewise, if we fill our minds with mental junk food, thoughts and ideas that are empty of Truth, the health of our souls will suffer. In this analogy it is important to understand how we eat, what we eat and why we eat, as well as the results of our eating.

How Do You Eat?

First, the how of what we eat. We eat spiritually by understanding and believing statements or propositions. A proposition is the meaning of a declarative sentence. A is B. Other types of sentences such as questions, exclamations or commands do not "feed" us Truth, although they may flesh out the broader narrative of what we are reading. The act and process of reading and meditating may correspond to chewing and digesting physical food. By the way, it is important to remember that all analogies, metaphors or figurative language have their limitations. We must not stretch their use to the breaking point or to an absurd end either. As we read and roll around in our minds (meditate/think about) what we are reading, those ideas are being absorbed into our thinking, into our souls like nutrients are absorbed into our blood stream through the villi of our small intestines. What we don't understand and/or believe may pass through us like indigestible matter. It won't have a long term effect on us.

What Are You Eating?

Secondly, let's consider the what of what we eat. In the physical realm our bodies need nutritious foods to promote growth, maintenance and the overall health of our bodies. If we want healthy bodies we must eat healthy foods and in their proper amounts. If we eat junk foods and very little nutritious foods we will become sick and may develop certain diseases which could affect our long term health and shorten our longevity. The science of nutrition is fairly new on the medical sciences' horizon and much greater research is needed to establish connections between our diets and our health. However, there is enough data to warrant the idea that we are what we eat and that our diets will have profound effects on our overall health. By the way, as a dietitian I am not a "puritan" when it comes to certain foods. In other words, I believe that if the majority of one's diet is sound a person can indulge in certain junk foods, in moderation, just for the sheer enjoyment of it. The problem arises when those foods crowd out the nutritious foods.

Now, spiritually speaking, these ideas apply to the health of our souls. If we want to grow spiritually and improve our spiritual health we must consume the proper diet. The best spiritual food, of course, is the Truth, the Scriptures. God's Word is all we need for faith and life as the Westminster Confession of Faith states. Of course, books about the Bible like commentaries, systematic theologies, surveys, sermons, confessions and catechisms are all very good, as well, as long as they conform to the Word of God. But a diet for long term health of our souls must include regular and consistent eating of God's Word. We must do this individually and corporately. This is a means of grace for us given by God. We should not only read the Bible but meditate upon it. This is not the Eastern or New Age version of meditation where one empties their mind in order to have an emotional, mystical experience. Rather, it is the rolling around in one's mind a passage of Scripture, a chewing the cud, ruminating on an idea. Also, as mentioned we should eat the Word corporately. We must attend the public worship of God and hear His Word preached. We should also be involved in Bible studies with other believers where we can discuss ideas and freely ask questions. Many times this will help stimulate thoughtful meditation in between meetings. With the availability of Bibles, countless books and internet sites we have a virtual banquet feast set before us. Are we taking advantage of it? By the way, I am also not advocating that we can only read the Bible and other theological books. We may need to read materials for an apologetic purpose and can therefore understand another worldview and be able to better defend the faith. We also may enjoy reading novels, science fiction or philosophical treatises for pure literary enjoyment. We just have to be discerning in our reading, and, like our diets, make sure that the majority of what we fill our minds with is spiritually nutritious.

Why Eat?

Next, let us consider the why of our spiritual eating. Some of this has been alluded to before. Physically we eat to stay alive. Of course there are those who live to eat rather than eating to live, but the point is that without food at some point we perish. Most of us don't eat just to survive physically. We enjoy the eating experience. We look forward to favorite foods or meals like Thanksgiving. God has given us taste buds and a sense of smell which adds a satisfying pleasure element to the eating process. That, of course, may also be part of the problem regarding our overeating and all the problems associated with it. Now, that idea can be applied to us spiritually. Do we have a genuine hunger and thirst for God's Word, for the Truth. Do we relish His Word with great delight? Or is it something we have to force ourselves to consume? If so, what is wrong with our appetites? In the physical realm a poor appetite is usually a symptom of underlying illness. Why have American Christians become so anorexic? It seems that American Christians have fat bodies and lean souls, when we should have lean bodies and fat souls, souls heavy with God's glory. The Hebrew word for glory, kabod, means heavy. Are we heavy with God's glory because we are consuming His Word, or are we anorexic in our souls because we feed on junk food?

Dietary Results

Finally, the results of our spiritual eating should be obvious by now. We are what we eat. We are what our minds consume and meditate upon. Our very spiritual health and well-being depends upon a biblically nutritious spiritual diet. We must not neglect the means of grace that God has given to us for this purpose. We must add to our consuming the Truth, prayer, the use of the sacraments and fellowship with other believers. Our lives depend on it. You are what you eat! May it glorify God and not dishonor Him!