Dec. 2006

Dec. 2006 (5)

Cloning is the production of one or more individual plants or animals (in whole or in part) that are genetically identical to an original plant or animal.

It will surprise at least a few people to discover cloning is not new. In fact it was practiced when I was a boy. In our garden. A portion of each potato harvest was set aside. This portion was not eaten but allowed to develop shoots. In the spring my father would cut up these potatoes, one shoot per piece, and plant them in the garden. And since each of the new plants had the same genetic makeup as the piece from which it grew, he unknowingly practiced cloning.

Similar instances of cloning are available. Strawberries and raspberries also reproduce from runners which are actually clones of the parent plant. The resulting plants will always bear fruit with the same color and taste.

We also see cloning among animals. Aphids can reproduce both sexually and by cloning. In spring the first aphid generation hatches from fertilized eggs. Later, the aphid lays eggs that start to divide without being fertilized. They are clones of the mother. Certain bees, ants, crustaceans, and lizards also reproduce by cloning.

Human beings are also sometimes naturally clones. Identical twins are clones. One fertilized egg splits in two-each sharing the same genetic material. These two people will have the same features once born, hence our description of them as identical twins.

These natural forms of cloning are hardly noticed in the discussion about the ethical permissibility. No one is inclined to say these naturally occurring forms of cloning are troublesome. Problems arise when other factors are introduced.

Can we say "Artificial"?

Consider the following possible benefits of cloning.

First, the best traits in certain plants and animals can be perpetuated. For example, Polly, a cloned sheep, is able to produce milk containing factor IX-the protein that is deficient in hemophiliacs.

Second, clones could be important for research. Genetically identical laboratory animals could be used as models for human disease. Having an identical animal to experiment with is nearly always advantageous.

Third, the most advantageous form of cloning includes genetic manipulation of plants and animals to produce stock that is resistant to disease while maintaining desirable qualities. Further, the introduction of genes from other plants and animals produce what appear to be some very favorable results. For example, if the gene which causes the production of poison in a scorpion is introduced into a cabbage, what results is a cabbage plant which is resistant to caterpillar damage. Or certain human genes may be introduced into sheep so that they secrete alpha-1 antitrypsin in their milk-a useful substance in treating some cases of human lung disease.

Fourth, it is believed that great possibilities exist for the treatment of diseases-particularly in humans. For example, cells could be harvested from early cloned embryos to provide cell and tissue replacement for the one who is cloned without the hazards of transplantation rejection.

To varying degrees all of these forms of cloning include ‘artificial' involvement. And so there is the concern that, in at least some cases, humans have begun to put themselves in the place of God-so changing the basic makeup of life forms that we have become the ‘creators' rather than the creatures.

Two Important Distinctions

So, what are we to say as Christians about cloning? The most uncomplicated answer seems to be to dismiss the practice entirely. But if we do, on what grounds? And what ethically separates cloning and genetic engineering from common practices such as selective breeding?

The Bible provides us with two important distinctions that provide us with some help.

The first distinction the Bible gives us is that between God and the rest of creation. Genesis 1-2 make it abundantly clear that God existed before the universe came into existence and such existence is the product of God's creative power. Realize that it is impossible for anyone to create as God has. God simply spoke, and all that is resulted from nothing. What is involved in cloning is the manipulation of what already exists.

Further, God has given to humanity the task to "fill the earth and subdue it . . .have dominion over [it]." (Gen. 1:26) Cloning and genetic engineering may be taken as an extension of that God-given task. Particularly when there is a benefit to mankind, such as crops that produce more and are more resistant to disease, this would seem in keeping with God's command. When humans breed wheat that can be cultivated in cold areas, or use artificial selection to get cows yielding more milk, we are also "manipulating nature." But, of course, few would (or should) oppose such intervention. It appears that God's instruction to humans to subdue the earth (Gen. 1:28) also allows for some types of cloning.

The second important distinction we should remember is that which exists between humans and the rest of creation. The Bible is clear in teaching that God created humans in a particular way (Gen. 1:26-27). Humans were created separately, in God's image, unlike the animal kingdom (Gen. 1:27). Our existence extends beyond physical death (Luke 16:19-31, Philippians 1:23). This is nowhere indicated for animals. God allowed humans to kill animals (Gen. 9:2-3). Concerning other humans, He gave the commandment: "You shalt not murder." (Ex. 20:13)

Additionally, humans are meant to have fathers and mothers-to be the offspring of a marriage relationship-the family ordained by God. While unfortunate circumstances in a fallen world mean that sometimes children have to be raised by only one parent, a clone could never have two parents. Thus the artificial cloning of a complete human being, because it deliberately sets out to cause such a situation, is opposed to biblical principles.

There are further reasons for rejecting the artificial cloning of humans. Each fertilized egg, including those from cloning, is a new human individual. Yet perfecting the cloning technique requires many experiments. Many individuals would begin life only to be deliberately destroyed.

Thus, while it may be right to clone animals to benefit people, it is contrary to God's Word to clone human beings.

Thursday, 02 June 2011 23:54

A Sympathetic High Priest

Written by Ron Morris

AFor we do not have a High Priest who cannot sympathize with our weaknesses, but was in all points tempted as we are, yet without sin. Let us therefore come boldly to the throne of grace, that we may obtain mercy and find grace to help in time of need."-Hebrews 4:15-16 NKJV

"Been there, done that." This popular maxim has been used to convey the idea that the speaker of this adage has experienced something to its fullest. When two people are talking and one quotes this expression, he is conveying to the other that he is fully aware of all that the other one is saying. There is nothing more that can be related that is not already known.

Often in the course of human interaction we find that there are certain events that only others who have experienced the same thing can truly understand. Because of this we see all sorts of "support groups." There are support groups for those with diabetes or weight problems, support groups for those who have battled cancer or lost a loved one. Because of the common experience, all those in the group have a certain sympathy toward the others in the group. A person in one of these support groups believes that the others in the group really understand the situation because they have also experienced the same thing. The reason these support groups are helpful is because they provide a certain level of encouragement and comfort which comes from a genuine sympathy to those who are weary or are struggling with a shared experience.

This is one facet of the incarnation that I believe is somewhat overlooked. We shall soon be celebrating Christmas, the time when we stop and give thanks for Christ's birth. There are many different and important aspects that could be brought out about Christ's incarnation. For example, as the Heidelberg Catechism teaches us in questions 14 through 17, if we are going to be saved from our sins, we must have a substitute who will take the punishment for our sins who is both God and Man. The incarnation provides for that. The Son of God, the second person of the Holy Trinity, by the operation of the Holy Spirit, was conceived in the womb of the virgin Mary. Because Jesus has taken on a human nature he can be a legitimate substitute for human beings. It would not be possible for an angel or a sheep to adequately take on the sins of a human because that would not be just or fair. A man must pay for the sins of a man. At the same time, no mere creature could fully bear the brunt of God's holy wrath against sin. So any substitute that would come in our stead must be both God and man.

But let us focus on another aspect of the incarnation: that facet is sympathy. As the writer of Hebrews tells us, Christ our High Priest can truly sympathize with us because he has "been there and done that." Since Christ Jesus took upon himself a human nature and human flesh, he has experienced life in this fallen world. What sorts of things did he experience?

Well, for one thing, we know that the Lord Jesus was tempted, yet without sin. The story of the temptation of the Lord, as recorded for us in Matthew 4, tells us that after his baptism, the Lord Jesus was led by the Spirit out into the wilderness where he fasted for forty days and was subsequently tempted by Satan. It is common to point out that the three temptations leveled against the Lord are parallel to the temptations that Adam and Eve experienced in the Garden of Eden. The Apostle John summarized these temptations in 1 John 2:16 as "the lust of the flesh, the lust of the eyes, and the pride of life." But, possibly, there was another temptation underlying each of the three that the Lord Jesus experienced. At the Lord's baptism a voice from heaven sounded and proclaimed, "This is my beloved Son." Then the Lord was driven into the wilderness to be tempted. The first two temptations Satan hurls at the Lord begin with the question, "If you are the Son of God." The third temptation has Satan quoting Psalm 91 and tempting Jesus to put the promises contained in that passage to the test. In other words, in each of the temptations, Satan is tempting Jesus to doubt the Word of God. In the first two, he tempts Jesus to question what he had heard from heaven: that he was the Son of God. The third temptation was to get Jesus to prove the written word with a foolish test of jumping off the pinnacle of the temple. In each of the temptations Satan tempted Jesus to question or to doubt the Word of God. Here's where an application comes in. Satan wants to tempt us in the same way. A main battle plan of the Devil is to get people to deny the Word of God. Is Jesus really the Son of God? Was he really born of a virgin? Was he really raised from the dead? These are the doubts Satan would tempt us with. But as our great Mentor has shown us, we combat the Devil with the Word. In each of the temptations the Lord Jesus retorted, "It is written." When Satan casts doubt upon the Word we realize that the Word has power and can defend itself. How else does one explain the intricate details of the messianic prophecies which paint a vivid picture of the birth, life, ministry, death and resurrection of the Lord Jesus (Luke 24:25-27)? How else does one explain the whole system of theology laid out in the various covenants, one building upon another in perfect harmony (The Book of Galatians)? The Word of God is called a "sharp, two-edged sword." A sword is an amazing weapon when you think about it. It is both defensive and offensive. With a sword you can block an oncoming blow from an enemy or you can plunge it through your opponent's chest. Don't be afraid to rely on the Word in times of testing or to use it in combat in times of spiritual struggle. The Lord Jesus did and he was victorious over the Devil.

There are other ways the Lord Jesus experienced life as we do, that helps us to know that He can sympathize with us, and that we can learn from Him. The Bible tells us that He got hungry (Matthew 4:2). He knows what its like to feel weak from a lack of nutrition. Being the father of six children I know from first hand that when people get hungry, they can get grumpy. (My children may testify to the same fact about their father!) It is helpful to know that the Lord Jesus experienced this most basic of human needs. The Bible tells us that He got thirsty (John 19:28). There were times when his mouth was so dry that his tongue clung to the roof of his mouth (Psalm 22:15). It can be an agonizing experience to have a mouth so dry that your tongue sticks to the roof of your mouth, but according to the Bible, the Lord Jesus can testify to that experience. There were times when He was tired and sleepy during long trips (Matthew 8:24). I serve a congregation in South Dakota. My family is in Oklahoma and my wife's family is in Colorado. At Christmas time we make "The Big Triangle" to see both sets of grandparents. 700 miles from Mitchell, SD to Tulsa, OK then 650 miles from Tulsa to Flagler, CO then 600 miles from Flagler back to Mitchell. That's a lot of miles on the road. That makes for a long trip. There is almost nothing worse than driving across Kansas with very heavy eyelids. If you don't know about it, I know that the Lord Jesus does because He has been sleepy and tired on long trips, too. There were times He was angry (John 2:14-16). When the Lord turned the tables of the money changers over in the temple, the Bible tells us that He chased them out with a whip. (I would say that's being on the wrong side of the Lord!) It is important to point out that this was a righteous, sinless anger. He was angry because people weren't doing right. Ever been that way? There were times when He was moved with compassion (Matthew 9:36) and He wept at the tomb of a close friend (John 11:35). Jesus got emotional when He saw people suffering and He cried at funerals.

There are other experiences that are not recorded for us in the Bible but might be legitimately assumed. For example, we know that He was a carpenter (Mark 6:3). Could we imagine that in His carpentry shop He might have picked up a splinter, or gotten saw dust in His eye? (Matthew 7:3-5?) Possibly He got blisters on His hands from working with tools on rough wood.

What about family relationships? We don't know what happened to Mary's husband, Joseph. Tradition has it that he died. If so, Jesus would have mourned the death of a man who was a father to Him. Have you ever lost a parent? Contrary to Roman Catholic tradition, the Bible teaches that Mary had at least six other children (Matthew 13:55-56). In that culture, the responsibility for tending to the needs of a family would have fallen on the eldest son after the death of the father. Could we imagine that Jesus experienced having the responsibility of being the head of a household? Ever felt that, husbands and fathers? Again, a lot of this is mere speculation and should only be regarded as such. But at the same time, it should give us something to ponder anew when we consider that we have a High Priest who can "sympathize with our weaknesses" and "was in all points tempted as we are" (Hebrews 4:15). Think of the practical implications of the incarnation: God Almighty knows what it is like to be human!

This Christmas as we read the birth narrative in Luke's gospel, take some time to ponder phrases such as, "And she brought forth her firstborn Son." They "wrapped Him in swaddling clothes." They "laid Him in a manger, because there was no room for them in the inn." Let each of those phrases sink in- really sink in- one by one. Then, consider who this was! God Almighty in human flesh. Understand that the Lord Jesus understands. God understands! He is aware of all of your trials and temptations. He knows what it's like to walk the earth's dusty streets in a fallen world. He knows what it's like to be misunderstood, mistreated and the victim of a miscarriage of justice. And when you understand that, know for certain that the awesome God who did all of this is deserving of your unending praise. But also know that such a one knows what you are going through. So go to Him. As the writer of the book of Hebrews so eloquently says, "For we do not have a High Priest who cannot sympathize with our weaknesses, but was in all points tempted as we are, yet without sin. Let us therefore come boldly to the throne of grace, that we may obtain mercy and find grace to help in time of need."

Thursday, 02 June 2011 23:53

You Must Be Born Again

Written by Thomas Mayville

Introduction

Ask most Reformed Christians what the word regeneration means, and the typical answer given will be: regeneration means the new birth or new life which the Holy Spirit brings about in the life of one formerly dead in their sins. This is a good, biblical answer. But let's delve a little deeper into this wonderful Bible doctrine of regeneration. Why is regeneration necessary? Which person(s) of the Trinity bring about regeneration? Is regeneration the work of God, the work of the sinner, or a partnership between God and the individual? What part do the Scriptures play in the regeneration of a sinner? Which comes first; regeneration or faith? Surveying the Bible and summarizing the material in Berkhof's Manual of Christian Doctrine, (Eerdmans Publishing, 1981) I will do my best to answer these questions for the reader.

Regeneration Defined

As with so many of the various aspects of our salvation, there is some overlap and a very close relationship between internal calling and regeneration. When the Triune God of Scripture calls one of His elect sinners to Himself, it is always His intention to give that sinner new life. To put it another way, the Lord never issues an internal call without fully intending to regenerate that individual. The Canons of Dort, Third Head of Doctrine, Article 8 states,

As many as are called by the gospel are unfeignedly called. For God has most earnestly and truly declared in His Word what is acceptable to Him, namely, that those who are called should come unto Him. He also seriously promises rest of soul and eternal life to all who come to Him and believe.

One thing the reader must be aware of as he or she reads Reformed theology is the fact that not all authors define regeneration in the same terms. Calvin, for example, used the word to include both conversion and sanctification. In the Three Forms of Unity, regeneration means the beginning of God's work of salvation in the new birth and conversion. Berkhof notes the following about the use of the word in modern Reformed circles-

Sometimes it is employed in more limited sense, as a designation of the implanting of the new life in the soul, apart from manifestations of this life (pg. 226) He goes on to give this excellent definition of regeneration: that act of God by which the principle of the new life is implanted in man, and the governing disposition of the soul is made holy.

What Happens in Regeneration?

1. God produces radical changes in the sinner.

When God gives new life to a sinner He radically changes the will, the emotions and the mind of the individual. The following Scriptures demonstrate this radical change in the sinner's mind which God effects: 1 Cor. 2:14-15, "But the natural man does not receive the things of the Spirit of God, for they are foolishness to him; nor can he know them, because they are spiritually discerned. But he who is spiritual judges all things, yet he himself is rightly judged by no one." 2 Cor. 4:6 "For it is the God who commanded light to shine out of darkness, who has shone in our hearts to give the light of the knowledge of the glory of God in the face of Jesus Christ." Eph. 1:18, "the eyes of your understanding being enlightened; that you may know what is the hope of His calling, what are the riches of the glory of His inheritance in the saints."

Then, there is the radical change God brings about in the will of the regenerated sinner. Philippians 2:13, "for it is God who works in you both to will and to do His good pleasure." Heb. 13:21 "make you complete in every good work to do His will, working in you what is well pleasing in His sight, through Jesus Christ, to whom be glory forever and ever. Amen."

Additionally, this radical change is seen in the emotions of the regenerated sinner. Ps. 42:1, "As the deer pants for the water brooks, So pants my soul for You, O God." 1 Pet. 1:8, "whom having not seen you love. Though now you do not see Him, yet believing, you rejoice with joy inexpressible and full of glory."

2. God produces immediate change in the sinner.

Just as the bodies of those raised from the dead by Christ were dead one moment and alive the next, so it is with regeneration. One moment we are dead in our sins, and the next, God gives us spiritual life. Whereas sanctification is a gradual process, lasting a lifetime, regeneration happens instantaneously, not gradually.

Why is Regeneration Necessary?

The Bible teaches us that holiness is absolutely necessary in order to enjoy fellowship and communion with the Holy One, the Triune God. Heb. 12:14, "Pursue peace with all people, and holiness, without which no one will see the Lord." Yet, Scripture also clearly teaches that, by nature, by birth, and by willful disobedience to the law of God, we are all like an unclean thing, "And all our righteousnesses are like filthy rags; We all fade as a leaf, And our iniquities, like the wind, Have taken us away." (Is. 64:6)

The Canons of Dort put it this way in the Third Head of Doctrine, Article 3, "Therefore all men are conceived in sin, and are by nature children of wrath, incapable of saving good, prone to evil, dead in sin, and in bondage thereto; and without the regenerating grace of the Holy Spirit, they are neither able nor willing to return to God, to reform the depravity of their nature, or to dispose themselves to reformation."

Therefore, these radical changes mentioned above must occur if we are to have any hope of fellowship and communion with the Holy God who has revealed Himself to us in His Word.

How Does Regeneration Come About?

In God's perfect timing for each of His elect, He, through the preaching, teaching, and/or reading of His Word calls the sinner to Himself. This calling coincides with the creation of new life in the soul of the sinner by the life-giving power of the Holy Spirit. The Canons of Dort describe this work of God's grace this way: "HeY powerfully illuminates their minds by His Holy Spirit, that they may rightly understand and discern the things of the Spirit of God; but by the efficacy of the same regenerating Spirit He pervades the inmost recesses of man; He opens the closed and softens the hardened heart, and circumcises that which was uncircumcised; infuses new qualities into the will, which, though heretofore dead, He quickens; from being evil, disobedient, and refractory, He renders it good, obedient, and pliable; actuates and strengthens it, that like a good tree, it may bring forth the fruits of good actions." (Third Head of Doctrine, Article 11)

Once God effects regeneration, conversion begins. Exactly how does this regeneration occur? Human conception can be explained scientifically, but such a clinical explanation does not plumb the depths of the mystery of the creation of a new life consisting of body and soul. Even so, the creative work of the Holy Spirit in regeneration cannot be completely comprehended in our imperfect state. But Christians are satisfied in knowing that God's regenerative grace has enabled them to believe on the Lord Jesus Christ and be saved from their sins and misery.

Regeneration-Whose Work Is It?

Once again, the Canons magnificently answer this question for us: "But that others who are called by the gospel obey the call and are converted is not to be ascribed to the proper exercise of free will, whereby one distinguishes himself above others equally furnished with grace sufficient for faith and conversion (as the proud heresy of Pelagius maintains); but it must be wholly ascribed to God, who, as He has chosen His own from eternity in Christ." (3rd Head, Article 10)

These statements are solidly based on the Old and New Testament Scriptures: "Then I will give them one heart, and I will put a new spirit within them, and take the stony heart out of their flesh, and give them a heart of flesh. (Ezek. 11:19) "Now a certain woman named Lydia heard us. She was a seller of purple from the city of Thyatira, who worshiped God. The Lord opened her heart to heed the things spoken by Paul." (Acts 16:14) "So then it is not of him who wills, nor of him who runs, but of God who shows mercy." (Rom. 9:16)

The Canons go on to reflect these passages in Article 12 stating that God works this regeneration without our aid. Contrary to the arguments of our Arminian friends, it is not the case that, "after God has performed His part, it still remains in the power of man to be regenerated or not, to be converted or to continue unconverted; but it is evidently a supernatural work, most powerful, and at the same time most delightful, astonishing, mysterious, and ineffable; not inferior in efficacy to creation or the resurrection from the dead, as the Scripture inspired by the Author of this work declares; so that all in whose heart God works in this marvelous manner are certainly, infallibly, and effectually regenerated, and do actually believe."

Conclusion

We have seen clearly, from the Scriptures and the Creeds that without regeneration, there is no hope for any sinner. God uses His Word to call the sinner to Himself, and by His Spirit breathes new life into his soul, heart, mind, will, and emotions. The Bible and our confessions clearly teach us that we cannot and will not believe until God first makes us alive. Finally, we have seen that regeneration is 100 percent a work of God's grace and zero percent the work of the sinner.

May these brief thoughts on this glorious doctrine cause our hearts to be filled with joy unspeakable and full of thanksgiving to God as we reflect on what it means to be born again.

Thursday, 02 June 2011 23:51

Looking at the Genealogy of Christ

Written by Vernon Pollema

"The book of the generation of Jesus Christ, the son of David, the son of Abraham. Abraham begat Isaac; and Isaac begat Jacob; and Jacob begat Judas and his brethren; and Judas begat Phares and Zara of Thamar; and Phares begat Esrom; and Esrom begat Aram; and Aram begat Aminadab; and Aminadab begat Naasson; and Naasson begat Salmon; and Salmon begat Booz of Rachab; and Booz begat Obed of Ruth; and Obed begat Jesse; and Jesse begat David the king; and David the king begat Solomon of her that had been the wife of Urias; and Solomon begat Roboam; and Roboam begat Abia; and Abia begat Asa; and Asa begat Josaphat; and Josaphat begat Joram; and Joram begat Ozias; and Ozias begat Joatham; and Joatham begat Achaz; and Achaz begat Ezekias; and Ezekias begat Manasses; and Manasses begat Amon; and Amon begat Josias; and Josias begat Jechonias and his brethren, about the time they were carried away to Babylon: and after they were brought to Babylon, Jechonias begat Salathiel; and Salathiel begat Zorobabel; and Zorobabel begat Abiud; and Abiud begat Eliakim; and Eliakim begat Azor; and Azor begat Sadoc; and Sadoc begat Achim; and Achim begat Eliud; and Eliud begat Eleazar; and Eleazar begat Matthan; and Matthan begat Jacob; and Jacob begat Joseph the husband of Mary, of whom was born Jesus, who is called Christ. So all the generations from Abraham to David are fourteen generations; and from David until the carrying away into Babylon are fourteen generations; and from the carrying away into Babylon unto Christ are fourteen generations." (Matthew 1:1-17)

"And Jesus himself began to be about thirty years of age, being (as was supposed) the son of Joseph, which was the son of Heli, which was the son of Matthat, which was the son of Levi, which was the son of Melchi, which was the son of Janna, which was the son of Joseph, which was the son of Mattathias, which was the son of Amos, which was the son of Naum, which was the son of Esli, which was the son of Nagge, which was the son of Maath, which was the son of Mattathias, which was the son of Semei, which was the son of Joseph, which was the son of Juda, which was the son of Joanna, which was the son of Rhesa, which was the son of Zorobabel, which was the son of Salathiel, which was the son of Neri, which was the son of Melchi, which was the son of Addi, which was the son of Cosam, which was the son of Elmodam, which was the son of Er, which was the son of Jose, which was the son of Eliezer, which was the son of Jorim, which was the son of Matthat, which was the son of Levi, which was the son of Simeon, which was the son of Juda, which was the son of Joseph, which was the son of Jonan, which was the son of Eliakim, which was the son of Melea, which was the son of Menan, which was the son of Mattatha, which was the son of Nathan, which was the son of David, which was the son of Jesse, which was the son of Obed, which was the son of Booz, which was the son of Salmon, which was the son of Naasson, which was the son of Aminadab, which was the son of Aram, which was the son of Esrom, which was the son of Phares, which was the son of Juda, which was the son of Jacob, which was the son of Isaac, which was the son of Abraham, which was the son of Thara, which was the son of Nachor, which was the son of Saruch, which was the son of Ragau, which was the son of Phalec, which was the son of Heber, which was the son of Sala, which was the son of Cainan, which was the son of Arphaxad, which was the son of Sem, which was the son of Noe, which was the son of Lamech, which was the son of Mathusala, which was the son of Enoch, which was the son of Jared, which was the son of Maleleel, which was the son of Cainan, which was the son of Enos, which was the son of Seth, which was the son of Adam, which was the son of God." (Luke 3:23-38)

Biblical genealogies, as a rule, do not receive a lot of attention. To most people genealogies are uninteresting and not all that important. Besides, the names are usually difficult to pronounce, and it can be embarrassing when required to read them out loud. However, the fact that genealogies are recorded in Scripture tells us that they are important and are there for a purpose, for "All Scripture is given by inspiration of God and is profitable for doctrine, reproof, correction and instruction in righteousness . . ." (2 Tim. 3:16).

There are a number of genealogies in the Bible, but for this article we will focus primarily upon the genealogies of Christ as they appear at the beginning of this article, as well as any other that might have a direct bearing.

So, what is the purpose of the genealogies of Christ? There are a number of answers that can be given, all of which have to do with God fulfilling His covenant of grace. As we discuss various aspects of the above genealogies, that central fact must always be in the forefront. There are a number of peculiarities or differences between Matthew and Luke's genealogies. Without going into great detail, these can be explained as follows:

Perhaps the most notable difference is where the two genealogies end up: Matthew with Abraham and Luke with Adam. Both are summarizing the history of the covenant which embraces the entire economy of God's sovereign grace. Luke traces Jesus' descent back to Adam, indicating that the whole of man's history from the very beginning has been, and continues, under the sovereign rule and control of God and that, from the very beginning, God had promised that He would divide humanity into two groups: the redeemed, who love God, and the reprobate, who love self and Satan. God says to the serpent (Satan): "And I will put enmity between thee and the woman, and between thy seed and her seed; it shall bruise thy head, and thou shalt bruise his heel" (Gen. 3:15). This division finds its ultimate fulfillment in the triumph of Christ as the second Adam, and those united with Him, over the power of sin, death and Satan (cf. Rom. 5:12-19; 1 Cor. 15:20-23, 45-49).

Matthew traces Jesus' descent back only to Abraham, to emphasize that Jesus is the goal and climax of the covenant of salvation by grace as formally established with Abraham as the spiritual father of all believers (cf. Rom. 4:11,12; Gal. 3:28, 29).

Matthew also organizes Christ's genealogy into three groups of fourteen (cf. 17), perhaps for graphic effect, but most certainly to show the history of the covenant people. The historical periods are from Abraham to David, from David to the Captivity, and from the Captivity to Jesus. These periods involve the origin, the rise to power, the decay and downfall of the house of David into its eternal establishment through David's greater Son and Lord, Jesus Christ: "And thine house and thy kingdom shall be established for ever before thee; thy throne shall be established forever" (2 Sam. 7:16; cf. Mk. 12:35-37; Acts 2:34-36).

Luke, on the other hand, is more concerned to list names from the beginning of the world to show that covenant community that Jesus, as the Second Adam, came to save.

Another difference or peculiarity is the name of Joseph's father, who is, according to some, Jacob in Matthew 1:16 and Heli in Luke 3:23. How is this to be explained? Is this a glaring contradiction or is Joseph, in some sense, a son of both Jacob and Heli? Luke 3:23 states: "And Jesus himself began to be about thirty years of age, being (as was supposed) the son of Joseph, which was the son of Heli." One explanation of the parenthetical phrase, "as was supposed," is as follows: Jesus was thought to be, by the uninformed, the biological son of Joseph, but was, in fact, only the biological son of Mary. Thus Joseph was the son-in-law of Heli who was actually Mary's father. Another explanation of the above is that the Greek text represents Jesus as being "the son of Heli, and not, as was supposed, the son of Joseph." Biologically, this makes Jesus the grand-son of Heli through His mother, Mary.

This leads to a consideration of the intent of each of the genealogies. Whereas Matthew gives the legal Davidic lineage through Joseph, Luke gives the blood (fleshly) lineage through Mary. While Joseph is explicitly declared to have been a descendant of David, Mary is not so described; but as implied by the following references, she too was of Davidic lineage. "Concerning his son Jesus Christ our Lord, which was made of the seed of David according to the flesh" (Rom. 1:3); "Remember that Jesus Christ of the seed of David was raised according to my gospel" (2 Tim. 2:8); "Therefore being a prophet, and knowing that God had sworn an oath to him [David], that of the fruit of his loins, according to the flesh, he would raise up Christ to sit on his throne" (Acts 2:30); Why is this blood or fleshly lineage important: I refer you to the Heidelberg Catechism:

Q35. What is the meaning of "conceived by the Holy Spirit, born of the Virgin Mary"? "That the eternal Son of God, who is and continues true and eternal God, took upon Himself the very nature of man, of the flesh and blood of the Virgin Mary, by the operation of the Holy Spirit, so that He might also be the true seed of David, like unto His brethren in all things, sin excepted."

Q16. Why must be he a true and righteous man? "Because the justice of God requires that the same human nature which has sinned should make satisfaction for sin, but one who is himself a sinner, cannot satisfy for others."

The legal Davidic lineage through Joseph is also important because it gave Jesus official claim to the Davidic throne. Jesus was the legitimate heir to become King. In addition, Matthew's genealogy through Joseph, meets the slander that Jesus was the illegitimate offspring of Mary. Joseph, in light of all the facts concerning the origin of Jesus (cf. Matt. 1:18-25), marries Mary and gives her the protection of his good name as well as royal lineage.

Another notable difference between the two genealogies is the inclusion of the names of women by Matthew, not all of whom were of noble character and would be considered serious blots in the family history of the Davidic house. For example, of the five women included, three were quite ignoble. Tamar reminds us of Judah's failure to follow through on his promise to give Tamar her dead husband's younger brother to raise up family seed and her subsequent deceptive seduction of Judah, her father-in-law, resulting in the birth of Pharez, whom we will consider later (cf. Gen. 38:6-30). Rahab, who harbored the spies sent by Joshua to explore the city of Jericho, was a prostitute (cf. Josh. 2:1-24). Bath-sheba, the wife of Uriah, one of David's mighty men, was a seductress and committed adultery with David (cf. 2 Sam. 11:1-27). Ruth, although of noble character, was a Moabitess, not of the covenant line, but of a lascivious and incestuous relationship between Lot and one of his daughters (cf. Gen. 19:29-38). Of all the women, only Mary is of Davidic descent, and because she finds favor with the Lord, is chosen to become the mother of Jesus. Why are the names of these women included? Mary, we can understand. But what about the other four? Surely it is to convey to us that God is no respecter of persons or nations and that, from the beginning to the end of the world, He will gather His people from out of the whole human race (cf. H.C. #54). These women, including Mary, also remind us that we are part of a chosen sinful community whom Jesus came to save and thus have nothing of which to boast (cf. Luke 1:46-48; Eph. 2:8,9).

The Book of Ruth is of special significance in the genealogy of Christ and provides a crucial, indispensable link between God's covenant promise and its fulfillment. To understand this, we must begin with the blessing (and prophecy, cf. 2 Sam. 7:16) that Jacob pronounces upon his son, Judah: "The scepter shall not depart from Judah, nor a lawgiver from between his feet, until Shiloh come; and unto him shall the gathering of the people be" (Gen. 49:10). However, when Jacob uttered this prophecy, Judah had most likely already disqualified his descendants from ruling. For that, we must go to Gen. 38 and the illegitimate child of Judah and his daughter-in-law, Tamar, who was named Pharez. Decades later, during the life of Ruth, the evil consequences of Judah's act were exposed by a law that seemed to cut off all hope of Judah's heirs ever holding royal office: "A bastard shall not enter into the congregation of the Lord; even to his tenth generation shall he not enter into the congregation of the Lord" (Deut. 23:3). To "enter into the congregation of the Lord" did not mean that illegitimates were prohibited from attending church, but that they were prohibited from holding office in the commonwealth of Israel. The Book of Ruth closes with the genealogy of Pharez, who, centuries in the past, through no fault of his own, happened to be a bastard son, yet in the royal line. Yet this law of God prevented Judah's heirs from holding any office for ten generations. And that is why the name Pharez comes up at the end of the book of Ruth as the people sing to Boaz, the husband of Ruth: "And let thy house be like the house of Pharez, whom Tamar bare unto Judah, of the seed which the Lord shall give thee of this young woman" (Ruth 4:12). And now look at the genealogy of Pharez: "Pharez begat Hezron, Hezron begat Ram, Ram begat Amminadab, Amminadab begat Nashon, Nahshon begat Salmon, Salmon begat Boaz, Boaz begat Obed, Obed begat Jesse, Jesse begat David" (Ruth 4:18-22). Count them. David was Judah's tenth descendant! The first descendant in Judah's line to become King was also the first descendant who was legally eligible!

Ultimately, of course, this points to Jesus Christ. As the angel Gabriel said to Mary: "And behold, thou shalt conceive in thy womb, and bring forth a son, and shalt call his name JESUS. He shall be great, and shall be called the Son of the Highest: and the Lord God shall give unto him the throne of his father David: and he shall reign over the house of Jacob for ever; and of his kingdom there shall be no end" (Luke 1:31-33).

Thursday, 02 June 2011 23:42

Peace or Division?

Written by Paul H. Treick

With the onset of celebrations like Christmas and Easter, the unbelieving world's internal clock tells them to ratchet up the attacks against the Christian faith. They accomplish this with the vain and obvious banning of religious symbols and greetings. As in the gospels, they are still taking Christ to court. A more subtle attack is on discrediting the work of Christ. They roll their eyes when they refer to "Peace on Earth" in the midst of a world that seems to be coming apart at the seams. Has the coming of Christ failed to bring peace?

Jesus informs us of an important fact when he describes His own mission and how it is received by the world. In Luke 12:51, Jesus states, "Do you suppose that I came to give peace on earth? I tell you, not at all, but rather division." The secular world still thinks that the coming of Jesus had a secular purpose-to bring all men together and to bring world peace. In this He has failed terribly, and thus Jesus can be dismissed as someone with good intentions, useful philosophical teachings, but actually accomplishing little.

Much of this confusion lies in the translation of Luke 2:14, which has generally been translated as, "Glory to God in the highest, and on earth peace, goodwill toward men." If ‘peace on earth' was the announced purpose of Jesus, where is the peace? Where is the goodwill among men? All we hear and read each day is the ‘body count' in the Middle East or violence in our streets.

An equally bad accusation is that the Bible has a contradiction between the statements of Luke 2:14 and Luke 12:51. Maybe Jesus intended to bring peace, but failed- due to the refusal of man. This thinking places Jesus on a par with all the other philosophers who tried to leave a message of peace, but, in the end, few listened. And Jesus failed.

We should note that Luke 2:14 is translated in a number of different ways based on the texts used. The NASB says, "Glory to God in the Highest, and on earth peace among men with whom He is pleased." This places the emphasis on the sovereignty of God in giving peace to His chosen people. The NIV suggests a similar emphasis in its translation: "Glory to God in the highest, and on earth peace to men on whom his favor rests." Others have translated this as, "Peace on earth toward men of goodwill." This latter translation seems to place the effectiveness of peace on man, not on God. I believe the NASB and NIV are on the right course-there is a peace on earth among men with whom God is well-pleased.

So, why did Jesus declare that he came to divide men (see Luke 12:52-53)? In Matthew 10:34, Jesus states, "Think not that I am come to send peace on earth: I came not to send peace, but a sword." The answer lies in the cross of Christ. This is why we preach Christ crucified (1 Cor. 2:2). It is the preaching of the cross of Christ that divides-for the Jews it is a stumblingblock, and for the Greek it is foolishness (1 Cor. 1:23), for unto us which are saved it is the power of God (1:18). For God to call out His people, separation from unbelief is necessary.

Colossians 1:20-23 give us the reason for the season and answers the question of peace or division, "And, having made peace through the blood of his cross, by him to reconcile all things unto himself; by him, I say, whether they be things in earth, or things in heaven. and you, that were sometime alienated and enemies in your mind by wicked works, yet now hath he reconciled in the body of his flesh through death, to present you holy and unblameable and unreproveable in his sight: If ye continue in the faith grounded and settled, and be not moved away from the hope of the gospel, which ye have heard, and which was preached to every creature which is under heaven; whereof I Paul am made a minister." Death is the penalty of sin, which Jesus suffered for all that the Father gave Him (Jn. 17:2, 3). Peace came through victory-the resurrection of Jesus is that victory that brings peace.

Why do divisions and attacks on the basic message of Christianity surface more at Christmas and Easter? Because the focus of the Gospel tells us that Jesus came to earth to bring peace to men on earth- only to those who repent of their sins and believe in the perfect atonement of Jesus. Jesus brought peace between miserable sinners and a Holy God by removing sin on the cross and by the imputation of His perfect righteousness. It brings division between believers and unbelievers, and the judgment of God remains on the latter.

We welcome the divisions between believers and unbelievers. Preaching Christ and the cross causes this. This was Christ's purpose. We see Christ calling His sheep and separating them from the wolves. He accomplished peace by reconciliation between God and His people. He then joins His sheep to God's fold. He did not fail. He brought peace to this earth.

The Peace on Earth that we anticipate is not political-but a new heavens and a new earth where the lion and lamb lay down together, and war is eliminated from the vocabulary. For this peace Christ came. It now reigns in the heart of every believer. He accomplished it. Rejoice in it now and forever.